ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025
Is there a difference between the incidence of subtypes of tibial plateau fractures between six different level 1, level 2 and level 3 trauma centers in the Netherlands?
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposesTibial plateau fractures can present as different subtypes due to variation in patient characteristics and trauma mechanisms. Insight in the fracture pattern and classification is critical for adequate treatment.This study aims to assess the incidence of tibial plateau fracture subtypes among various levels of trauma centers in the Netherlands, to explore potential variations in fracture patterns and fracture classifications between these centers.
methodsOver a one-year period data was collected from six Dutch trauma centers representing different levels of trauma care. Fractures were classified using both Schatzker and Luo's systems. Interobserver agreement was calculated to evaluate the consistency of fracture classification among surgeons.
resultsWe included 115 patients treated for a tibial plateau fracture across six different hospitals. The mean patient age was 54 years, ranging from 17 to 85 years. Differences in fracture incidence and mechanisms of injury across trauma centers were revealed; Level 1 trauma centers treated a higher proportion of high-energy trauma cases, predominantly Schatzker 6 fractures, while level 2 and 3 centers dealt with more low-energy traumas, particularly Schatzker 2 fractures. Interobserver agreement for both classification systems was moderate, indicating challenges in classifying tibial plateau fractures accurately.
conclusionThis study sheds light on the diverse distribution of subtypes of tibial plateau fractures in Dutch trauma centers. Level 1 centers are treating younger, high-energy trauma patients, whereas level 2 and 3 centers handle more low-energy traumas, predominantly Schatzker 2 fractures.
trial registrationMETC Oost-Nederland: 2021-13,184.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.