Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39972289›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2025

Interdisciplinary strategies for establishing a trusting relation as a pre-requisite for existential conversations in palliative care: a grounded theory study.

Annica Lagerin, Christina Melin-Johansson, Bodil Holmberg, Tove Godskesen, Elin Hjorth, Lena Junehag, Carina Lundh Hagelin, Anneli Ozanne, Johan Sundelöf, Camilla Udo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Confidential Conversations in Palliative Care: Capability, Vulnerability, and Relational Encounter.Nursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Annica LagerinDepartment of Health Care Sciences, Marie Cederschiöld University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Christina Melin-JohanssonDepartment of Health Care Sciences, Marie Cederschiöld University, Stockholm, Sweden. christina.melin-johansson@miun.se.
Bodil HolmbergDepartment of Health and Caring Sciences, Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden.
Tove GodskesenFaculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Nord University, Bodø, Norway.
Elin HjorthDepartment of Health Care Sciences, Marie Cederschiöld University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Lena JunehagDepartment of Health Care Sciences/Nursing, Mid Sweden University, Kunskapens väg 8, Östersund, 831 25, Sweden.
Carina Lundh HagelinDepartment of Health Care Sciences, Marie Cederschiöld University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Anneli OzanneInstitute of Health and Care Sciences, Gothenburg University, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Johan SundelöfDepartment of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Camilla UdoDepartment of Health and Welfare, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunication is central to implementing palliative care (PC) and effective interdisciplinary team functioning. Communication about existential issues is often urgent in PC, yet interdisciplinary teams frequently lack the time and education to meet these communication needs. Thus, more knowledge of existential conversations in different PC contexts is required.

aimThis study aimed to gain an in-depth understanding of healthcare professionals' (HCPs) experiences of existential conversations with patients with PC needs and their next-of-kin by generating a theoretical model.

methodSeven focus-group interviews that included 26 HCPs who worked with PC patients in different care settings were carried out in 2020 and 2022. The grounded theory method was used to analyse and compare data from the interview transcripts.

resultsThe HCPs' primary concern in daily work was establishing a trusting relationship, a prerequisite for enabling existential conversations with a person with PC needs and/or their next-of-kin. The main concern was characterised by the core category maintaining presence and four categories describing interdisciplinary strategies that the HCPs used to achieve a trusting relationship and enable existential conversations in the late phase of life. Several potential barriers also hindered existential conversations. The theoretical model 'meaningful existential conversations in PC' was constructed.

conclusionsThe interdisciplinary strategies used to establish existential conversations, the potential barriers to these conversations and the model we present can be used as a basis for reflection in professional collaborative learning in PC, as a tool for teachers in educational PC programmes and as a guide for HCPs in PC.

Indexed as

CommunicationExistentialismHealth PersonnelPalliative CareTrustAdultFemaleFocus GroupsGrounded TheoryHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Care TeamQualitative ResearchCommunicationEnd-of-lifeExistentialHealthcare personnelInterdisciplinaryPalliative carePresenceQualitative methods

Identifiers

PMID39972289
PMCPMC11837293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.