ArticleBMC health services research2025
Exploring a process-oriented way of working - a case study involving primary and specialised care.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHealth care organisations have a long history of dividing work and tasks into decentralised functions and units by forming divisions and departments with delegated power. New ways of working, such as process-oriented approaches, have been called for to address challenges such as staffing shortages and resource constraints. There is limited understanding of the interplays that will occur in health care organisations during a shift from a traditional decentralised structure to a process-oriented approach. This study aims to explore the perceptions of health care staff and leaders when introducing a process-oriented routine.
methodWe conducted interviews and focus groups with 29 participants in specialised and primary care in order to explore their experiences of a newly introduced routine regarding on-demand consultation, aimed at enhancing communication and patient coordination in a Swedish health care region. The participants included operating managers, schedulers and physicians. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis in accordance with Braun & Clark's guidance.
resultsThe findings encompass three main themes when introducing a process-oriented routine: Creates a readiness to act, The critical role of trust for adopting on-demand consultation in everyday practice and Challenges associated with transformation. The results show that health care staff and leaders are positive about the new way of working, but the readiness to act is challenged by issues of trust, as well as cultural components and structural factors such as experienced resource constraints.
conclusionOur results underscore the need to consider not only organisational aspects but also social and individual relational factors when introducing a process-oriented way of work into a decentralised and complex health care system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.