ArticleBMC geriatrics2025
Educational attainment and male-female health-survival paradox among older adults in China: a nationally representative longitudinal study.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiovascular disease prevention by personalized health promotion considering educational attainment.Scientific reports · 2026Trial
- Healthy Lifestyle Behaviors of Adults Aged 95 Years and Above and Their Relationship with Geriatric Syndromes.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2026Article
- Socioeconomic factors outweigh perceived built environmental influences on self-rated health among middle-aged and older adults in western China.Frontiers in sociology · 2026Article
- Prevalence of Sarcopenia and Frailty in Geriatric Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.Rambam Maimonides medical journal · 2025Article
- Sociodemographic Factors Associated with Physical Functioning in Elderly Males and Females from Serbia: Population-Based Modeling Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe male-female health-survival paradox is characterized by the phenomenon where "women get sicker, but men die quicker." Health expectancy, as a composite metric that encompasses both the quantity and quality of life, serves as a unique tool for analyzing this gender paradox. In this study, we investigate the relationship between educational attainment and the gender paradox among older adults in China.
methodsUtilizing data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), we focused on community-dwelling individuals aged 60 and above. Health was assessed using the Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Educational attainment was dichotomized into low (primary education and below) and high (secondary education and above). We controlled for demographic, socioeconomic, and health behaviors confounders. Microsimulation techniques were employed to estimate total life expectancy (TLE), disability-free life expectancy (DFLE), and health ratio.
resultsIn China, educational attainment was positively associated with TLE and DFLE, with these benefits being more pronounced in females. Among individuals with lower educational attainment, females had significantly greater TLE (female-male difference: 3.82 years, 95% CI: 3.68 to 3.96) and DFLE (2.91 years, 95% CI: 2.78 to 3.04), but a lower health ratio (-2.14%, 95% CI: -2.41% to -1.87%) compared to males. In contrast, females with higher educational attainment not only lived longer but also healthier. Among these individuals, females had significantly greater TLE (5.89 years, 95% CI: 5.71 to 6.08), DFLE (6.02 years, 95% CI: 5.84 to 6.19), and a more favorable health ratio (95% CI: 2.60% to 3.19%) compared to males.
conclusionsEducation plays a crucial role in enabling females to overcome disadvantages associated with the gender paradox in China. Enhancing gender equality in educational opportunities is expected to promote healthy longevity among females in the country.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.