ArticleBMC cancer2025
Therapeutic outcomes of thermal ablation versus repeated hepatic resection for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma by using propensity score analysis: a multicenter real-world study.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prognostic outcomes of surgery vs. non-surgery in initially unresectable HCC with successful conversion via ICI + TKI therapy.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe therapeutic value of thermal ablation (TA) versus repeat hepatic resection (RHR) for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (rHCC) after initial hepatic resection is uncertain. This study aimed to investigate the prognosis of TA and RHR. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this multicenter real-world retrospective study, 473 patients were enrolled between January 2015 and August 2023, with 340 in the TA group and 133 in the RHR group. Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were employed to reduce selection bias. Local tumor progression (LTP), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and post-recurrence survival (PRS) were compared before and after PSM and IPTW.
resultsA total of 473 patients (231 aged ≥ 60 years; 393 men) were evaluated. LTP, RFS, and PRS rates did not differ significantly between groups before (P = 0.940, P = 0.180, and P = 0.700) and after matching (P = 0.420, P = 0.680, and P = 0.810) and weighting (P = 0.940, P = 0.180, and P = 0.700). Multivariable Cox analysis identified tumor number (HR: 2.28; P < 0.001) and PLT (HR: 0.73; P = 0.038) as independent prognostic factors for RFS in the entire rHCC cohort. And tumor location, size, number, ascites, AST, and AFP (HR: 0.55-2.18; P = 0.004-0.046) were independent prognostic factors for PRS. Subgroup analysis showed both TA and RHR were effective treatments for rHCC, regardless of tumor size, number, subcapsular, or perivascular lesions.
conclusionsThe cumulative LTP, RFS, and PRS were not significantly different between TA and RHR for rHCC within the Milan criteria. TA may be a viable curative option for early-stage rHCC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.