Observational studyEye (London, England)2025
Geographical differences in ophthalmic trauma outcomes and risk factors: the International Globe and Adnexal Trauma Epidemiological Eye Study (IGATES).
Observational study in Eye (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
42 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesCharacterise the international variation in ophthalmic trauma and determine risk factors associated with visual and anatomical outcomes for low-, middle- and high-income countries. SUBJECTS/
methodsObservational multi-centre cohort study using data from the International Globe and Adnexal Trauma Epidemiological Eye Study (IGATES) from April 2014 to August 2023. Data on acute presentations of ophthalmic injury including open/closed globe injury, and/or Adnexal/orbital involvement, and/or intraocular/ intraorbital foreign body were collected and Ocular Trauma Score (OTS) was calculated. A total of 5350 patients (5557 eyes) from 31 centres in 12 countries were included. The main outcome measures included demographics, mechanism and setting of injury, and presenting and final visual outcomes. Descriptive statistics, Kruskal-Wallis tests and multinomial logistic regression (MLR) analysis are presented, with correction performed using the Hochberg method. P values less than 0.005 were significant.
resultsAge, gender, presenting and final best-corrected visual acuity were all strongly associated with country (p < 0.005). Poor final visual outcomes were strongly associated with OTS predictions, type of injury (p < 0.005) and delayed presentation as well as firework injuries. High-income countries (HIC) showing reduced duration to presentation (HIC 5 h) and increased improvement in visual acuity (HIC -0.40) compared to low to middle-income countries (LMICs) (28 h) (-0.19). MLR analysis identified a significant association between countries' income classification and BCVA worse than 6/60, presence of scleral, iris, limbus injury and surgery being undertaken (p < 0.005).
conclusionData from 31 centres internationally identified differences in demographic trends for each country. Age was identified as a risk factor for eye injuries. Low- and middle-income countries were associated with longer delays to presentation, smaller gains in BCVA and poorer visual outcomes. IGATES provides an opportunity to collect global data on ophthalmic trauma to facilitate improved management and prevention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.