SynthesisScientific reports2025
Suture versus stapler in distal pancreatectomy and its impact on postoperative pancreatic fistula.
Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Impact of Pancreatic Stump Wrapping with Mesh on Post-Operative Pancreatic Fistula in Patients Undergoing Distal/Left Pancreatectomy for Malignant or Benign Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Pooled it
- High-risk factors for postoperative complications in patients with pancreatic disease: a single-center experience.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Postoperative pancreatic fistula is a critical complication after distal pancreatectomy. The aim of this systematic review is to assess new reports on the main pancreatic stump closure techniques (stapler and hand-sewn suture) in distal pancreatectomy, to define their influence on postoperative pancreatic fistula rates. A literature review was performed following PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO: CRD42023408181). The survey was conducted in Medline (via PubMed) and EMBASE. Clinical trials and cohorts were included if they assessed pancreatic fistula rates after distal pancreatectomy, and excluded if they used a fistula rating system other than the ISGPF one. The risk of bias was assessed using the Study Quality Assessment Tools | NHLBI, NIH. A meta-analysis was presented as forest-plots. Eleven articles were included, representing 1498 patients. No significant difference was found between Suture and Bare stapler (95% CI 0.91-1.68) or Bare stapler and Reinforced stapler for A-graded fistula rates (95% CI 0.78-1.28) and B-graded fistula rates (I-squared = 0.0%, p = 0.784). Most articles showed unclear risk of detection bias. This meta-analysis found no difference in fistula rates between stump closure techniques. This choice should be made by surgeons' and hospital administration's preferences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.