ArticlePediatric research2025
Community-oriented, hospital level genetics: a new approach to improve access for underserved communities.
Article in Pediatric research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCertain populations are at increased risk for genetic syndromes but have limited access to genetic testing.
methodsWe founded a community-based, pediatric genetics clinic in the Muslim-Arab city of Tayibe, Israel. Children with suspected genetic conditions of consanguineous parents, or families with two or more affected siblings were referred by local staff. The clinic was staffed by a Meir Medical Center (MMC) clinical geneticist. Blood samples were collected during the initial visit. Tests were publicly funded, with no parental involvement in administrative procedures required. A control group consisted of MMC pediatric genetics clinic patients.
resultsDuring the first year, 30 children were assessed. No patients were lost to follow-up, compared to 8 (28%) in the MMC control group. The average time to test results was shorter in the Tayibe group and the diagnostic rate was higher, with 27.6% receiving a diagnosis (42.9%, excluding autism cases).
conclusionOur first-year experience shows the success and promising results of this model, with advantages in almost all parameters, compared to the traditional, hospital-based clinic. Factors such as faster time-to-results, greater family adherence and satisfaction, and zero lost to follow-up rate suggest considering implementing this model for providing genetic services to other underserved populations. IMPACT: A community-oriented approach for a pediatric genetics clinic allowed reaching high-risk populations, with increased adherence, faster results and a higher yield. Our clinic relied solely on available public funding and staff, requiring no additional contributions. The current dogma of hospital-based genetics services should be reconsidered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.