Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39972098›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Ensemble fuzzy deep learning for brain tumor detection.

Asma Belhadi, Youcef Djenouri, Ahmed Nabil Belbachir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Asma BelhadiOsloMet University, Oslo, Norway.
Youcef DjenouriDepartment of MicroSystems, University of South-Eastern Norway, Kongsberg, Norway. youcef.djenouri@usn.no.
Ahmed Nabil BelbachirNorwegian Research Center, Grimstad, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This research presents a novel ensemble fuzzy deep learning approach for brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) analysis, aiming to improve the segmentation of brain tissues and abnormalities. The method integrates multiple components, including diverse deep learning architectures enhanced with volumetric fuzzy pooling, a model fusion strategy, and an attention mechanism to focus on the most relevant regions of the input data. The process begins by collecting medical data using sensors to acquire MRI images. These data are then used to train several deep learning models that are specifically designed to handle various aspects of brain MRI segmentation. To enhance the model's performance, an efficient ensemble learning method is employed to combine the predictions of multiple models, ensuring that the final decision accounts for different strengths of each individual model. A key feature of the approach is the construction of a knowledge base that stores data from training images and associates it with the most suitable model for each specific sample. During the inference phase, this knowledge base is consulted to quickly identify and select the best model for processing new test images, based on the similarity between the test data and previously encountered samples. The proposed method is rigorously tested on real-world brain MRI segmentation benchmarks, demonstrating superior performance in comparison to existing techniques. Our proposed method achieves an Intersection over Union (IoU) of 95% on the complete Brain MRI Segmentation dataset, demonstrating a 10% improvement over baseline solutions.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsDeep LearningFuzzy LogicImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingAlgorithmsBrainHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID39972098
PMCPMC11840070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.