ArticleScientific reports2025
Core decompression assisted by multi-functional minimally invasive instruments for the treatment of early osteonecrosis of the femoral head.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Core decompression is a common method for treating early osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). However, the surgical procedure is cumbersome due to the lack of appropriate surgical instruments. This study aims to modify surgical instruments to improve surgery efficiency. A total of 28 patients with early ONFH treated with the core decompression were enrolled. 13 cases were treated with new instruments and the other 15 cases were treated with the traditional methods. The convenience of the new instruments was evaluated by comparing evaluation indicators. The multi-functional instruments reduced the number of fluoroscopy, shorted the operation time, improved the delivery efficiency, reduced the intraoperative blood loss, and reduced the surgical incision compared with the traditional method (p < 0.05). The new instruments removed the healthy bone of the femoral head and neck for reuse, the overall hospitalization cost was lower, and patient satisfaction was higher (p < 0.05). In the postoperative follow-up, the VAS was lower and Harris score was higher compared with the traditional group (p < 0.05). The multi-functional instruments can achieve the advantages of accurate positioning of the necrotic area, removed and reused healthy bone, effective expanded decompression, and efficient implant delivery, which is the effective instrument for the early ONFH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.