ArticleScientific reports2025
A real-world pharmacovigilance analysis of hepatitis B vaccine using the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Case-control study of risk factors for abscess development following hepatitis B vaccination in children in Timor-Leste, 2024.PloS one · 2026Article
- Adverse events following Synflorix vaccination reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 2010-2024.PloS one · 2026Article
- Adverse events following 9-valent human papillomavirus vaccine (GARDASIL® 9) reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 2015-2024.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hepatitis B vaccines (HBVs) are widely used duo to their high clinical use and mild effects. However, as post-marketing data accumulate, several serious adverse events (SAEs) following HBV have been reported. Currently, quantitative studies based on real-world data are lacking, and information on their adverse events is limited. Adverse reaction signals of the HBV were mined and analyzed using the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) to provide a reference for the safe clinical use of this vaccine. Multiple statistical methods, including the reporting odds ratio (ROR) method, the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) method, and the Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN) method, were utilized to identify signals of HBV-associated adverse reactions, and positive signals consistent with designated medical events (DMEs) were singled out for focused comparison and discussion. Analysis of 54,136 HBV-related adverse events (AEs) identified 254 positive signals across 22 System Organ Classifications (SOCs), with General disorders and administration site conditions being the most common. Three potential positive new signals consistent with Preferred Terms (PTs) were identified in DME: Aplastic anaemia, Dermatitis exfoliative, and Haemolytic anaemia. This study suggests that HBV has a potential risk in terms of causing Aplastic anaemia, Dermatitis exfoliative, and Haemolytic anaemia. Some subtypes of Aplastic anaemia, Dermatitis exfoliative, Haemolytic anaemia are autoimmune diseases, and immunization may stimulate potential autoimmune genetic predisposition, people with autoimmune diseases or a family history of hereditary immune diseases should be monitored after receiving HBV. Health professionals should be contacted to take measures to help if anaemia, palpitations, and high fever occur.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.