ArticleScientific reports2025
AI-enabled diagnosis and localization of myocardial ischemia and coronary artery stenosis from magnetocardiographic recordings.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Heart's Electromagnetic Field in Emotions, Empathy and Human Connection: Biosensor-Derived Insights into Heart-Brain Axis Mechanisms and a Basis for Novel BioMagnetoTherapies.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Progress in Clinical Magnetocardiography: The Contactless Breakthrough for Noninvasive Clinical Detection of Cardiac Ischemia Now Needs Worldwide Standardization.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Prediction of post-PCI angina risk using machine learning-based magnetocardiography model.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence and Electrocardiography for Cardiovascular Disease Diagnosis.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Magnetoionography enhances diagnostic accuracy of magnetocardiography in coronary artery disease.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Non-invasive mapping of ventricular action potential waveforms reconstructed from clinical unshielded magnetocardiography. Potential diagnostic application and current limitations.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early diagnosis and localization of myocardial ischemia (MS) and coronary artery stenosis (CAS) play a crucial role in the effective prevention and management of ischemic heart disease (IHD). Magnetocardiography (MCG) has emerged as a promising approach for non-invasive, non-contact, and high-sensitivity assessment of cardiac dysfunction. This study presents a multi-center, AI-enabled diagnosis and localization of myocardial ischemia and coronary artery stenosis from MCG data. To this end, we collected a large-scale dataset consisting of 2,158 MCG recordings from eight clinical centers. We then proposed a multiscale vision transformer-based network for extracting spatio-temporal information from multichannel MCG recordings. Anatomical prior knowledge of the coronary artery and the irrigated left ventricular regions was incorporated by a carefully designed graph convolutional network (GCN)-based feature fusion module. The proposed approach achieved an accuracy of 84.7%, a sensitivity of 83.8%, and a specificity of 85.6% in diagnosing IHD, an average accuracy of 78.4% in localization of five MS regions, and an average accuracy of 65.3% in localization of stenosis in three coronary arteries. Subsequent validation on an independent validation dataset consisting of 268 MCG recordings collected from four clinical centers demonstrated an accuracy of 82.3%, a sensitivity of 83.8%, and a specificity of 81.3% in diagnosing IHD, an average accuracy of 77.3% in localization of five myocardial ischemic regions, and an average accuracy of 65.6% in localization of stenosis in three coronary arteries. The proposed approach can be used as a fast and accurate diagnosis tool, boosting the integration of MCG examination into clinical routine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.