ArticleScientific reports2025
Development of a new hybrid model to enhance streamflow estimation using artificial neural network and reptile search algorithm.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improving the performance of daily pan evaporation (EvScientific reports · 2025Article
- Integrated approach of extreme learning machines and locally weighted linear regression for improved discharge coefficient prediction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A new metaheuristic optimizer combined with artificial neural networks is proposed for streamflow prediction. Hence, the study aimed to forecast monthly streamflow of the main rivers in Urmia, Iran, by considering data shortage and using artificial neural network (ANN) models. By combining three variables: temperature, precipitation, and streamflow, we formulated five patterns, where 70% of the data were used for model training, and 30% for model testing. To improve the performance of ANN, we evaluated a new optimization algorithm, reptile search algorithm (RSA), and compared the results with combinations of ANN, particle swarm optimization algorithm (PSO), and whale optimization algorithm (WOA) models. The results of the ANN + RSA were promising at most stations and patterns. At Band station streamflow simulation testing gave RMSE, MAE, and NSE of 1.65, 1.21 MCM/month, and 0.80, respectively. At Babaroud station they were 4.01, 3.0 MCM/month and 0.68, respectively, at Nazlo station 5.62, 3.79 MCM/month, and 0.69, respectively, and at Tapik station 5.69, 3.82 MCM/month, and 0.59, respectively. However, the results of the ANN + PSO hybrid model were better than ANN + RSA. The impact of different parameters on the accuracy of streamflow prediction varied depending on model and streamflow station, indicating that the models do not perform consistently across different locations, times, and conditions. The inclusion of lagged monthly streamflow in the model was an influential input parameter. The results demonstrated that the new algorithm consistently improved predictions, enhancing the performance of traditional algorithms. The findings of this study highlight advantage of the ANN + RSA hybrid model for specific areas, suggesting its potential application in other similar hydrological problems for further validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.