Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39972022›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2025

Efficacy and safety of esketamine for emergency endotracheal intubation in ICU patients: a double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial.

Xue Zhang, Xin Zhao, Jiaxin Xu, Hong Liu, Shiying Yuan, Jiancheng Zhang

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05464979 (Clinical Effects of Esketamine Induction Intubation Versus Conventional Induction Intubation in ICU Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05464979 early_phase1completednot on this map

Clinical Effects of Esketamine Induction Intubation Versus Conventional Induction Intubation in ICU Patients: a Single-center Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUnion Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyRan2022 to 2023Enrolled80ConditionsCritically Ill PatientsArmsEsketamine Hydrochloride 28 Mg in 0.2 mL NASAL SOLUTION [Spravato], midazolam, fentanyl
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xue Zhang *Department of Critical Care Medicine, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, People's Republic of China.
Xin Zhao *Department of Critical Care Medicine, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, People's Republic of China.
Jiaxin Xu *Department of Critical Care Medicine, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, People's Republic of China.
Hong LiuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, People's Republic of China.
Shiying YuanDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, People's Republic of China. yuan_shiying@163.com.
Jiancheng ZhangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, People's Republic of China. zhjcheng1@126.com.

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2021YFC2501800National Natural Science Foundation of China 82071480National Natural Science Foundation of China 82272231
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emergency endotracheal intubation in critically ill patients are dangerous procedures with a greater risk of severe hypotension The efficacy and safety of esketamine with sympathoexcitatory effects for rapid sequence induction in critically ill patients remain unclear. In this prospective double-blinded randomized controlled trial, adult patients were randomly assigned to receive either esketamine or midazolam/sufentanil admixture for induction. The primary outcomes were the effects of induction with esketamine or midazolam/sufentanil admixture on hemodynamic responses (heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) during and after induction). Secondary outcomes were the duration of ventilation support, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, 28-day mortality. We enrolled 80 patients, of whom 38 were assigned to the esketamine group and 42 to the midazolam/sufentanil admixture group. The MAP in group esketamine was significantly higher than that in group midazolam/sufentanil admixture during the induction, and at 1 min, 5 min and 10 min after intubation. No significant differences in HR between groups were observed. The duration of ventilation support [105.3 (interquartile range (IQR) 40.9 - 248.3) hours vs. 211.5 (IQR 122.1 - 542.1) hours, P = 0.002] and the length of ICU stay [7.0 (IQR 4.0 - 16.3) days vs. 15.0 (IQR 8.0 - 26.0) days, P = 0.002] were significantly decreased in group esketamine, compared to that in group midazolam/sufentanil admixture. In group esketamine, less norepinephrine [0.00 (IQR 0.00 - 0.10) µg/kg/min vs. 0.09 (IQR 0.00 - 0.29) µg/kg/min, P = 0.016] was needed. There was no significant difference in 28-day mortality between the two groups. No serious adverse events occurred. In conclusion, esketamine is a hemodynamically stable induction agent in critically ill patients, which could reduce the length of ICU stay and the duration of ventilation support.Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov (19/07/2022; NCT05464979).

Indexed as

Intubation, IntratrachealKetamineAdultAgedCritical IllnessDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHeart RateHemodynamicsHumansIntensive Care UnitsLength of StayMaleMidazolamMiddle AgedProspective StudiesEsketamineKetamineMidazolamAnesthesia inductionEmergency endotracheal intubationEsketamineHypotensionIntensive care

Identifiers

PMID39972022
PMCPMC11840142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.