Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39971950›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Spatiotemporal variation and dynamic simulation of carbon stock based on PLUS and InVEST models in the Li River Basin, China.

Yu Bai, Xiangling Tang, Feng Xue, Dujiang Long, Jianhong Li, Yaoguo Tang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yu BaiCollege of Earth Sciences, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin, 541004, China.
Xiangling TangCollege of Earth Sciences, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin, 541004, China. 915907173@qq.com.
Feng XueGuilin Tourism College, Guilin, 541004, China.
Dujiang LongGuilin Tourism College, Guilin, 541004, China.
Jianhong LiInstitute of Karst Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Guilin, 541004, China.
Yaoguo TangNanning Meteorological Bureau, Nanning, 530029, China.

Funding

Scientific Research and Technology Development Program of Guilin,Guangxi, China 20230111-1the natural science foundation of China GuangXi 2020GXNSFAA297266
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The watershed is the optimal natural division for ecosystems, playing a crucial role in carbon reduction and sequestration. Exploring the carbon sequestration potential of terrestrial ecosystems under different land use scenarios and enhancing regional carbon storage capacity is of significant importance. In this study, the LUCC in the Lijiang River basin under the scenarios of natural evolution (NE), natural conservation (NC), urban developmentand (UD) and farmland protection (FP) in 2040 was simulated by using grid data, driver grid data and carbon density data, based on the PLUS model and the InVEST model. Then, the effects of land use change on carbon stock in the Lijiang River Basin from 2000 to 2040 were evaluated. The results show that, (1)from 2000 to 2020, the area of arable land significantly increased in the Li River Basin, while forest and grassland areas decreased significantly. The distribution pattern of land use in the Li River Basin is mainly influenced by factors such as economy, population density, topography, and roads. Population growth and economic development require more arable land, forest land, and construction land. (2)Due to land use change, the carbon stock in the Li River Basin decreased by 3.69 × 10

Indexed as

Carbon stockInVESTLand use changeLi River BasinPLUSScenario analysis

Identifiers

PMID39971950
PMCPMC11839974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.