ArticleScientific reports2025
An integrated CRITIC and EDAS model using linguistic T spherical fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators and its application to group decision making.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A novel decision making approach based on Picture Hesitant Fuzzy Environment for optimizing art education strategies.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Bipolar complex q-rung orthopair fuzzy aggregation operators for enhanced decision-making in uncertain environments.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Impact of massive open online courses in higher education using machine learning and decision based fuzzy frank power aggregation operators models.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Circular q-rung orthopair fuzzy modeling using Schweizer-Sklar weighted aggregation for water purification strategy selection.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A novel muirhead mean operators based decision algorithm with applications in the orientation of basketball players using circular q-rung orthopair fuzzy information.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Green technologies are defined as the utilization of advanced scientific and technological methodologies to fabricate products that minimize environmental impact. The assessment of green technology alternatives necessitates a comprehensive analysis incorporating a multitude of criteria, many of which may be conflicting. Optimal selections must encompass technical performance, economic feasibility, environmental sustainability, and societal implications. Additionally, the data gaps and vague information typical when dealing with emerging technologies make traditional techniques unproductive. This work thus proposes a dynamic multi-criteria group decision making (MCGDM) model by integrating the Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation (CRITIC) method with the Evaluation based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS) technique under the linguistic T-spherical fuzzy (LT-SF) environment. Initially, we define some Hamacher operations for LT-SF numbers (LT-SFNs) and then use them to develop some Hamacher aggregation operators (HAOs) synthesizing expert assessments. Meanwhile, some prominent features of these newly developed operators are also discussed. Next, we introduce a novel LT-SF-CRITIC-EDAS model, where LT-SF-CRITIC determines criteria weights, and LT-SF-EDAS evaluates the ranking of available alternatives. To illustrate the designed model's applicability, we apply it to a real-world scenario of selecting the most appropriate green technology from available options. Finally, a sensitivity analysis and comparative evaluation against existing methods demonstrate our proposed approach's superior feasibility and reliability. This research contributes to advancing decision making methodologies for assessing green technologies under complex and uncertain conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.