ArticleNature communications2025
Mass spectrometry methods and mathematical PK/PD model for decision tree-guided covalent drug development.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [EJNMMI research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Covalent drug discovery efforts are growing rapidly but have major unaddressed limitations. These include high false positive rates during hit-to-lead identification; the inherent uncoupling of covalent drug concentration and effect [i.e., uncoupling of pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD)]; and a lack of bioanalytical and modeling methods for determining PK and PD parameters. We present a covalent drug discovery workflow that addresses these limitations. Our bioanalytical methods are based upon a mass spectrometry (MS) assay that can measure the percentage of drug-target protein conjugation (% target engagement) in biological matrices. Further we develop an intact protein PK/PD model (iPK/PD) that outputs PK parameters (absorption and distribution) as well as PD parameters (mechanism of action, protein metabolic half-lives, dose, regimen, effect) based on time-dependent target engagement data. Notably, the iPK/PD model is applicable to any measurement (e.g., bottom-up MS and other drug binding studies) that yields % of target engaged. A Decision Tree is presented to guide researchers through the covalent drug development process. Our bioanalytical methods and the Decision Tree are applied to two approved drugs (ibrutinib and sotorasib); the most common plasma off-target, human serum albumin; three protein targets (KRAS, BTK, SOD1), and to a promising SOD1-targeting ALS drug candidates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.