Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39971889›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular translational research2025

Sensitivity of Left Atrial Flow Dynamics to Echocardiographic and Computed Tomography Data.

Ahmad Bshennaty, Brennan J Vogl, Ghasaq Saleh, Agata Sularz, Mohamad Alkhouli, Hoda Hatoum

Abstract readComparative StudyValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular translational research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ahmad BshennatyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, USA.
Brennan J VoglDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, USA.
Ghasaq SalehDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Agata SularzDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Mohamad AlkhouliDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Hoda HatoumDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, USA. hhatoum@mtu.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5538-8960

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational simulations are a powerful tool in the understanding, diagnosing, and treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Incomplete clinical data often limits computational assessment, which may lead to inaccuracies. This study aims to assess the sensitivity of left atrial flow dynamics to echocardiographic and computed tomography data. Models of the LA were reconstructed at the E-wave(Geometry 1)and end-diastolic(Geometry 2)phases from CT scans. CFD simulations were carried out using 3 different sets of BCs. BC2 and BC3 presented similar results that were significantly different from BC1. The effect from the choice of geometry was significant with BC2 and BC3 but minor with BC1. Differences in parameters across the simulated cases highlight the importance of using consistent BCs and geometries for CFD studies. Acquiring the pressure in the LA does not seem to be necessary for the accuracy of CFD simulations. Validation of all simulations indicates reliable patient-specific results.

Indexed as

Atrial Function, LeftHeart AtriaHemodynamicsModels, CardiovascularPatient-Specific ModelingTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedAtrial PressureBlood Flow VelocityComputer SimulationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsAtrial flowBoundary conditionsComputed tomographyEchocardiography

Identifiers

PMID39971889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.