ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2025
Inhibition in large set sizes depends on search mode, not salience.
Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Signal suppression 2.0: An updated account of attentional capture and suppression.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Attention can be attracted to salient items in a visual scene. Recent studies have shown that when the feature of an irrelevant salient item is known, it can be suppressed below baseline leading to facilitated search. Wang and Theeuwes (Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 46(10), 1051-1057, 2020) criticised previous inhibition studies by claiming that the sparse displays attenuated the salience of the distractors. In their study they increased the number of display items (i.e., set size), and found that an irrelevant salient distractor captured attention. The current paper argues that the displays used by Wang and Theeuwes encouraged participants to use a singleton search mode, in which participants actively look for salient regions to find the target and consequently do not inhibit salient items. Specifically, their displays included multiple repeated non-target shapes, so that the target became a singleton. We used two search displays with ten items, one with repeated non-targets (R-NT displays), allowing a singleton search mode, and one with heterogeneous non-targets, encouraging a feature search mode. In Experiment 1 the singleton distractor was inhibited in the heterogeneous condition, but not in the R-NT condition. Experiment 2 intermixed the two display types in unbalanced blocks. When the majority of trials had heterogeneous non-targets, inhibition was observed for both the heterogeneous displays and the R-NT displays. Conversely, when R-NT displays were the majority, inhibition was attenuated for both display types. These results show that distractor features can be suppressed at large set sizes dependant on the search strategy promoted by the displays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39971886What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.