Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39971886›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2025

Inhibition in large set sizes depends on search mode, not salience.

Zachary Hamblin-Frohman, Jay Pratt, Stefanie I Becker

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zachary Hamblin-FrohmanSchool of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. zachhamfro@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6305-2148
Jay PrattDepartment of Psychology, The University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Stefanie I BeckerSchool of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attention can be attracted to salient items in a visual scene. Recent studies have shown that when the feature of an irrelevant salient item is known, it can be suppressed below baseline leading to facilitated search. Wang and Theeuwes (Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 46(10), 1051-1057, 2020) criticised previous inhibition studies by claiming that the sparse displays attenuated the salience of the distractors. In their study they increased the number of display items (i.e., set size), and found that an irrelevant salient distractor captured attention. The current paper argues that the displays used by Wang and Theeuwes encouraged participants to use a singleton search mode, in which participants actively look for salient regions to find the target and consequently do not inhibit salient items. Specifically, their displays included multiple repeated non-target shapes, so that the target became a singleton. We used two search displays with ten items, one with repeated non-targets (R-NT displays), allowing a singleton search mode, and one with heterogeneous non-targets, encouraging a feature search mode. In Experiment 1 the singleton distractor was inhibited in the heterogeneous condition, but not in the R-NT condition. Experiment 2 intermixed the two display types in unbalanced blocks. When the majority of trials had heterogeneous non-targets, inhibition was observed for both the heterogeneous displays and the R-NT displays. Conversely, when R-NT displays were the majority, inhibition was attenuated for both display types. These results show that distractor features can be suppressed at large set sizes dependant on the search strategy promoted by the displays.

Indexed as

AttentionInhibition, PsychologicalPattern Recognition, VisualAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultAttentionInhibitionVisual search

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.