ArticleCardiovascular toxicology2025
Cardiovascular Toxicity Profile of Macrolides Investigated Using VigiBase Data: A Pharmacovigilance Study.
Article in Cardiovascular toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiotoxicity of macrolide antibiotics: a pharmacovigilance study integrating FAERS and JADER databases.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Cardiovascular Risk During the 90-Day Vulnerable Window After COPD Exacerbations: A Narrative Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in Heart Failure: From Pathophysiological Mechanisms to Therapeutic Targets.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Macrolides are associated with cardiovascular toxicity risk. However, data on their cardiovascular toxicity profiles beyond QT prolongation are limited, and differences in the profiles among various macrolide antibiotics remain unclear. We investigated the cardiovascular toxicity profiles of different macrolides using VigiBase, a global database of individual case-safety reports. Disproportionality analysis was performed using VigiBase, the WHO Pharmacovigilance database, from 1968 to December 2023. Associations between five macrolides (erythromycin, clarithromycin, azithromycin, josamycin, and roxithromycin) and adverse events (20 cardiovascular toxicities and diarrhea as a positive control) were predicted using the reporting odds ratio. Reported outcomes were evaluated for suggested drug-adverse event associations. Among the 36,129,107 reports analyzed, azithromycin was the most commonly used macrolide, followed by erythromycin, clarithromycin, roxithromycin, and josamycin. Diarrhea was frequently reported among users. Azithromycin use was associated with hypertension, cardiac valve disorders, supraventricular tachyarrhythmias, ventricular tachyarrhythmias, torsade de pointes/QT prolongation, cardiac conduction disorders, heart failure, and hemorrhage-related laboratory abnormalities. Erythromycin and clarithromycin use were also associated with cardiac valve disorders, ventricular tachyarrhythmias, torsade de pointes/QT prolongation, and cardiac conduction disorders. The rates of caused/prolonged hospitalization in azithromycin-related hypertension, heart failure, and bleeding-related laboratory abnormality were 46%, 45%, and 50%, respectively. Each of the macrolide antimicrobials was associated with various cardiovascular toxicities, including Cardiac valve disorder, shock, and QT prolongation. Notably, azithromycin was associated with an increased frequency of reported hypertension and heart failure, distinguishing it from the other drugs. These results highlight the importance of considering the cardiovascular toxicity profile of individual macrolide antibiotics when prescribing them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.