ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2025
Rate of Neoplasia in Patients with Complicated Acute Appendicitis Managed Nonoperatively: A Prospective Study.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Editorial: True Incidence of Appendiceal Neoplasms in Patients Presenting with Complicated Appendicitis: A Call for a Revised Management Algorithm.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Reply to the Letter to the Editor Regarding "True Incidence of Appendiceal Neoplasms in Patients Presenting with Complicated Appendicitis: A Call for a Revised Management Algorithm".Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- True Incidence of Appendiceal Neoplasms in Patients Presenting with Complicated Appendicitis: A Call for a Revised Management Algorithm.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Nonoperative management of uncomplicated acute appendicitis; results of 5 years follow.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecent studies suggest the rate of neoplasia in patients with complicated acute appendicitis initially managed nonoperatively is higher than previously reported.
objectiveThis study aimed to determine the incidence and predictors of neoplasia in patients with complicated appendicitis treated nonoperatively.
methodsWe conducted a prospective cohort study of all patients who presented to a tertiary care center with acute appendicitis between 2019 and 2023. Patients with complicated appendicitis treated nonoperatively were included in the study cohort. Patient demographics, clinical course, radiological findings, and pathologic information were collected. The primary outcome was rate of neoplasia. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of appendiceal neoplasia.
resultsIn total, we identified 1166 patients with acute appendicitis, of whom 75 patients had complicated appendicitis treated nonoperatively (median age 51 years [interquartile range 38-68]; 36 [48%] were female). Fifty-four (72%) patients had their appendix removed due to failure of nonoperative management, recurrent symptoms, suspicion of neoplasia, or elective surgery. The neoplasia rate among patients with complicated appendicitis initially treated nonoperatively was 16.0% (12/75). Two patients with neoplasia were younger than 40 years of age. Suspicion of malignancy on initial imaging was associated with an increased risk of appendiceal neoplasia (odds ratio 8.13, 95% confidence interval 1.20-55.15; p = 0.03). Age, sex, and appendiceal diameter were not significantly associated with appendiceal neoplasia.
conclusionsThe high rate of appendiceal neoplasia in patients with complicated appendicitis treated nonoperatively should be a factor in decision making for interval appendectomy for patients of all ages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39971859What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.