ArticleDiscover oncology2025
Sample size required for prognostic genes analysis in colorectal cancer.
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDifferent colorectal cancer (CRC) studies rarely report overlapping prognostic genes. This study aimed to investigate the effects of sample size on prognostic genes analysis in CRC.
methodsWe included 418 CRC cases detected by whole-exome sequencing (WES) in the TCGA PanCancer cohort and 931 CRC cases detected by targeted sequencing in the MSK cohort. Prognostic genes analysis was repeated 200 times at each sample size level using a random resampling method.
resultsFor WES data, the number of prognostic genes increased in a power-law with increasing sample size in CRC cases with stage III and IV. This pattern also applied to CRC patients with stage II after the removal of patients with MSI-H or POLE mutations. However, for targeted sequencing data, the number of prognostic genes increased linearly with increasing sample size in CRC cases with stage III and IV. About 550 cases were required for stage IV CRC to reach the plateau of prognostic genes. In both cohorts, the proportion of true prognostic genes relative to sample size was consistent with a binomial distribution, indicating a significant effect of sample size on the reliability of prognostic genes. At the same sample size level, the number of prognostic genes from the WES data was higher than that from the targeted sequencing data, while the reliability of prognostic genes from the WES data was lower.
conclusionThis study shows the relationship between the number of prognostic genes and sample size in CRC and how mutation data affects this relationship. This will contribute to the trial design for prognostic genetic analysis in CRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.