ArticleScientific reports2025
Residual force depression is affected by muscle length.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Stretch-shortening cycles mitigate single muscle fibre power deficits following a two-week immobilization of the rat hindlimb.Journal of muscle research and cell motility · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The isometric force attained after active shortening is smaller than that attained during purely isometric contractions, although the sarcomere length and activation level are the same. This phenomenon is known as residual force depression. This study aimed to examine whether the magnitude of residual force depression is affected by muscle length. Single-skinned fibers obtained from the rabbit psoas muscle (n = 8) were used in this study. We measured the isometric forces at an average sarcomere length of 2.1, 2.4, and 2.7 μm, and the isometric forces attained after active shortening (from 2.7 to 2.4 μm, and from 2.4 to 2.1 μm) to calculate the magnitude of residual force depression attained at both long (2.4 μm) and short (2.1 μm) length conditions. The magnitude of residual force depression was significantly larger in the long than short condition (p = 0.046). Although not statistically significant, the mean force attained during shortening was greater in the long than in the short condition (p = 0.074, note that all fibers showed larger mechanical work in the long condition). This tendency of difference in force (mechanical work attained during shortening) between the conditions is one of the reasons for muscle length-dependent residual force depression; however, some fibers showed small differences in mechanical work and large differences in residual force depression between the conditions, indicating that the magnitude of mechanical work did not simply explain the magnitude of residual force depression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.