ArticleAnnals of hematology2025
Venetoclax and hypomethylating agents versus tagraxofusp in older patients with blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm.
Article in Annals of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Tagraxofusp in adult blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm: clinical trials and real-world outcomes: a systematic review.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Diagnosis and Management of Blastic Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cell Neoplasm.International journal of dermatology · 2026Article
- Article
- Longer survival and favorable healthcare resource utilization of tagraxofusp versus venetoclax in patients with blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm: results of a real-world analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN) is a highly aggressive and rare hematologic malignancy characterized by poor response to multiagent chemotherapy and dismal survival outcomes of 8-16 months. Tagraxofusp, the first-in-class CD123-directed antineoplastic agent, has emerged as a highly effective therapy and is the only FDA approved drug for BPDCN. Nonetheless, significant treatment-related toxicities with tagraxofusp such as hepatotoxicity and capillary leak syndrome are unfortunately not uncommon and can be prohibitive for older or unfit patients. The success of venetoclax (VEN) with a hypomethylating agent (HMA) has recently been described in the literature however, clinical outcomes are limited to case reports and small case series. To confirm these findings, we performed a multicenter, retrospective cohort study utilizing the TriNetX Networks database to compare survival outcomes between BPDCN patients (≥60 years-of-age) who received VEN + HMA versus tagraxofusp. In total, 32 and 39 patients received VEN + HMA and tagraxofusp, respectively, between February 1, 2019 and September 1, 2024. Median follow-up time was 7.4 and 9.3 months in the VEN + HMA and tagraxofusp cohorts, respectively. Overall survival (OS) between VEN + HMA and tagraxofusp-treated patients was comparable at 12-months (41.2% vs. 53%; HR 1.15; 95% CI, 0.53-2.48; P = 0.73). In a subgroup analysis of older adult patients (≥75 years-of-age), OS at 12-months (38.1% vs. 56.5%; HR 1.20; 95% CI, 0.47-3.04; P = 0.71) was not significantly different. In conclusion, this large-scale, retrospective database analysis suggests that VEN + HMA is an effective therapeutic alternative to tagraxofusp in older patients for the management of BPDCN. Future studies are needed to prospectively validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.