Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39971763›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2025

Evaluation of fracture lines in adolescent lumbar spondylolysis using MR bone imaging as an alternative to computed tomography.

Kohei Okuyama, Yasuchika Aoki, Yukio Matushita, Tuyoshi Toyooka, Takayuki Sakai, Shiro Sugiura, Seiji Ohtori, Satoru Nishikawa

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kohei OkuyamaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan. kohei.oku.mm09@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-7312-5670
Yasuchika AokiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Eastern Chiba Medical Center, 3-6-2 Okayamadai, Togane City, Chiba, 283-8686, Japan.
Yukio MatushitaNishikawa Orthopedics Clinic, 1-14-2 Ohsakidai, Sakura, Chiba, 285-0817, Japan.
Tuyoshi ToyookaNishikawa Orthopedics Clinic, 1-14-2 Ohsakidai, Sakura, Chiba, 285-0817, Japan.
Takayuki SakaiDepartment of Radiology, Eastern Chiba Medical Center, 3-6-2 Okayamadai, Togane City, Chiba, 283-8686, Japan.
Shiro SugiuraNishikawa Orthopedics Clinic, 1-14-2 Ohsakidai, Sakura, Chiba, 285-0817, Japan.
Seiji OhtoriDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan.
Satoru NishikawaNishikawa Orthopedics Clinic, 1-14-2 Ohsakidai, Sakura, Chiba, 285-0817, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe diagnosis of adolescent lumbar spondylolysis typically requires computed tomography (CT) imaging; however, concerns regarding medical radiation exposure have emerged. With recent advancements in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), it has become possible to acquire CT-like images using an MR bone imaging approach. This study aimed to investigate whether MR bone imaging can be utilised as a substitute for CT in evaluating the fracture line in patients with adolescent spondylolysis.

methodsWe included 24 patients (28 levels) diagnosed with adolescent lumbar spondylolysis between June and August 2023. In addition to the usual MRI, MR bone imaging and CT scans of the affected area were performed. Two raters evaluated the fracture lines on sagittal images and determined their presence or absence. For statistical analysis, we calculated the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of MR bone imaging using CT as the reference standard. Furthermore, we assessed intra- and inter-observer agreement using Cohen's Kappa coefficient.

resultsThis study included 42 fractured pars and 14 non-fractured pars interarticularis controls. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of MR bone imaging were 0.846, 1.00, and 0.893, respectively, for rater A and 0.789, 1.00, and 0.857, respectively, for rater B. The intra-observer agreement rates were 0.841 and 0.769 for raters A and B, respectively. Inter-observer agreement rates were 1.00 for CT and 0.875 for MR bone imaging.

conclusionOur results show that MR bone imaging can detect fracture lines in adolescent lumbar spondylosis at a level comparable to that of CT in clinical settings.

Indexed as

Lumbar VertebraeMagnetic Resonance ImagingSpinal FracturesSpondylolysisTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdolescentChildFemaleHumansMaleSensitivity and SpecificityAdolescent lumbar spondylolysisFracture linesFracturesMR bone imaging

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.