Observational studyDiabetologia2025
Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in women with GCK-MODY: an observational study based on standardised insulin modalities.
Observational study in Diabetologia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02556840 (Impact of Two Standardized Clinical Care Protocols on Pregnancy Outcomes in Women With Monogenic Diabetes MODY2), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Impact of Two Standardized Clinical Care Protocols on Pregnancy Outcomes in Women With Monogenic Diabetes MODY2
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pregnancy and Neonatal Outcomes in Maturity-Onset Diabetes of the Young: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Pooled it
- Maturity onset diabetes of the young in pregnancy: management, treatment and neonatal outcomes-a systematic review.Acta diabetologica · 2026Review
- Personalized management of glucokinase-related monogenic diabetes (GCK-MODY) during pregnancy: a case report.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aims/hypothesisThe management of GCK-MODY during pregnancy remains challenging. We evaluated the impact on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of two standardised insulin strategies.
methodsIn this prospective observational study, participants chose (in agreement with their physician) to be treated with insulin either when maternal capillary blood glucose (CBG) ≥ thresholds for gestational diabetes (5.3 mmol/l before or 6.7 mmol/l 2 h after meals) (MG group) or when fetal abdominal circumference ≥75th percentile (FG group). In the FG group, insulin was also initiated if CBG ≥ safety levels (6.7 mmol/l before meals or 11.1 mmol/l 2 h after meals). Data on glycaemic management, modalities and timing of insulin therapy and maternal and neonatal outcomes were recorded.
resultsIn the MG group (n=25), insulin was initiated more frequently (100% vs 75%, p=0.01) and earlier (p=0.001), with lower CBG and more frequent hypoglycaemic episodes compared with the FG group (n=21). However, there were no differences in pregnancy and neonatal outcomes. In the total cohort, the rate of large for gestational age (LGA) neonates, preterm deliveries and Caesarean sections was 22.2%, 2.2% and 40%, respectively. The rate of LGA was 0% among the neonates with the GCK variant vs 36% in those without (p=0.005). There were no associations between LGA and pregnancy characteristics, insulin therapy strategy or glycaemic management. CONCLUSIONS/
interpretationIn our study, the rate of LGA primarily depended on the fetal GCK genotype rather than the treatment strategy or glycaemic management. Our results suggest that a standardised strategy based on ultrasound monitoring of fetal growth and glycaemic safety thresholds, leading to delayed insulin initiation, offers a good fetal prognosis and minimises the risk of maternal hypoglycaemia.
trial registrationClinTrials.gov NCT02556840.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39971752What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.