Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39971741›Full record

ArticlePathogens and disease2025

Isolate-specific rat brain transcriptional responses to rat lungworm (Angiostrongylus cantonensis).

Phoebe Rivory, Rogan Lee, Jan Šlapeta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pathogens and disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Phoebe RivorySydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Rogan LeeNSW Health Pathology, Centre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology Lab Services, Level 3 ICPMR, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia.
Jan ŠlapetaSydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1459-9117

Funding

Sydney School of Veterinary SciencesUniversity of Sydney
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rat lungworm (Angiostrongylus cantonensis) is an invasive parasite of rats that in accidental hosts, such as dogs and humans, causes eosinophilic meningitis. In Australia, only two distinct rat lungworm cox1 haplotypes have been detected in clinically affected dogs, with haplotype Ac13 implicated in most cases. Using locally sourced isolates, we enquired whether the brain migrating larvae elicit different host response in its natural host. We examined brain transcriptome, faecal shedding rates, and adult worm of A. cantonensis isolates representing two distinct cox1 haplotypes, SYD.1 and Ac13 (represented by isolate SYD.2), in experimentally infected Wistar rats. For SYD.1-infected rats, only one differentially expressed gene (DEG) was upregulated in the compared to controls. In contrast, the transcriptome of SYD.2-infected rats included 100 DEGs, with enrichment of functional terms related to immune response, neuroactivity, and signalling. Faecal shedding did not differ between SYD.1- and SYD.2-infected rats, but adult worm burdens were higher in the SYD.1 group. The increased immune response in SYD.2-infected rats provides evidence that there is strain specific virulence that is pronounced in its natural host. This study provides initial parasite-specific evidence explaining why clinically affected dogs are more frequently presented with A. cantonensis haplotype Ac13.

Indexed as

Angiostrongylus cantonensisBrainStrongylida InfectionsTranscriptomeAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalDogsFecesGene Expression ProfilingHaplotypesHost-Parasite InteractionsRatsRats, WistarangiostrongyliasisAustraliahaplotypeimmunityRNA-seqtranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID39971741
PMCPMC11895509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.