Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39971718›Full record

ArticleAnnals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery2025

Short-term and long-term outcomes of pancreas preserving total duodenectomy: A case series from a single center with 13 years' experience and complimentary meta-analysis.

Mohammed Hammoda, Shahab Hajibandeh, Bilal Al-Sarireh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mohammed HammodaDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9855-2257
Shahab HajibandehDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3294-4335
Bilal Al-SarirehDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5974-187X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Backgrounds/Aims: To determine short-term and long-term outcomes after pancreas preserving total duodenectomy (PPTD). Methods: A case series and a complementary meta-analysis were conducted. All patients with (pre)neoplastic lesions of duodenum who underwent PPTD in a tertiary center for pancreatic surgery between May 2009 and October 2022 were included for the case series. All studies in the literature with a sample size of 10 or more patients reporting outcomes of PPTD were included for the meta-analysis. Results: A total of 439 patients (18 from case series and 421 from literature) were analyzed. Clavien-Dindo (CD) I complications in 2.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.6%-5.2%), CD II complications in 21.1% (14.6%-27.6%), CD III complications in 18.1% (9.3%-26.9%), CD IV complications in 2.7% (0.5%-4.9%), and CD V complications in 2.2% (0.2%-4.2%) of patients were found. Probabilities of overall survival and recurrence-free survival at 15 years were 87% and 86%, respectively. There was no significant difference in the risk of mortality (odds ratio [OR]: 0.82, Conclusions: PPTD is safe and feasible for (pre)neoplastic lesions of duodenum not involving the pancreatic head. The risk of severe complications (CD > III) is low and long-term outcomes are favorable. Whether PPTD provides advantages over more radical techniques in terms of long-term outcomes remains controversial and requires further research.

Indexed as

ComplicationsDuodenectomySurvival

Identifiers

PMID39971718
PMCPMC12093244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.