Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39971614›Full record

ArticleBMJ paediatrics open2025

Daily life situations and participation of siblings of children with childhood-onset disabilities: a scoping review.

Johanna Linimayr, Judith Graser, Selina Gredig, Hubertus J A van Hedel, Anne Tscherter, Sebastian Grunt, Christina Schulze

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ paediatrics open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Johanna LinimayrInstitute of Occupational Therapy, School of Health Sciences, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland lini@zhaw.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-1302-4074
Judith GraserResearch Department, Swiss Children's Rehab, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Affoltern a. Albis, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9921-8581
Selina GredigInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-7942-6120
Hubertus J A van HedelResearch Department, Swiss Children's Rehab, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Affoltern a. Albis, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9577-5049
Anne TscherterInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6972-482X
Sebastian GruntDivision of Neuropediatrics, Development and Rehabilitation, Department of Pediatrics, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2820-9650
Christina SchulzeInstitute of Occupational Therapy, School of Health Sciences, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5662-5347

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSiblings of children with disabilities or childhood-onset chronic conditions (eg, autism, cerebral palsy or congenital heart disease) often face challenges in mental health, quality of life and psychosocial adjustment. However, comprehensive knowledge of their participation in daily activities remains limited. Understanding their participation patterns and potential restrictions can help clarify their needs. AIMS AND

methodsThis scoping review aims to summarise current research on the participation of siblings of children with childhood-onset chronic conditions. Following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology, we systematically searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, AMED, PsycINFO and ERIC for peer-reviewed studies published in English between 2001 and 2024. Eligible studies focused on siblings of children with disabilities or early-onset chronic conditions (population) and their participation, including attendance and involvement in daily activities (concept) across children's homes, communities and schools (context). The review adheres to the Preferred Reporting Items for Scoping Reviews guidelines.

resultsA total of 62 articles met the inclusion criteria: 45 qualitative (73%) and 7 quantitative (11%) studies, 7 reviews (11%) and 3 meta-studies (5%). The studies covered various chronic conditions (eg, cancer, chronic kidney disease and Down syndrome), with autism being the most common (22 studies). Key participation themes identified include family life, home participation, school involvement, leisure activities, social interactions with peers, information-seeking and continuous meaning-making. Factors such as normalcy, advocacy, identity, gender, age, culture and socioeconomic status were found to intersect with participation.

conclusionsThis review provides a comprehensive overview of current research and contributes to our understanding of how participation in daily activities has been studied so far in the population of siblings of children with disabilities. It reveals a gap in research specifically measuring participation among siblings. The identified themes enhance our understanding of potential participation restrictions in this population.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingChildren with DisabilitiesSiblingsSocial ParticipationChildChronic DiseaseHumansQuality of LifeAdolescent HealthCaregiversChild HealthOccupational therapyRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID39971614
PMCPMC11840906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.