ReviewBasic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology2025
Predictive Biomarkers and Personalized Therapy: Use of Pharmacogenetic Testing in a Scandinavian Perspective.
Review in Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Individualized pharmacotherapy: background and development.Annals of translational medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Precision medicine has significantly advanced through the development of predictive biomarkers based on pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing. These tests identify interactions between drugs and genetic variants that influence patient responses to treatments. Understanding genetic variations in drug-metabolizing enzymes, receptors and transporters and their impact on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics allows for the prediction of drug effects and side effects, enabling tailored treatments for different patient groups. This review focuses on drugs metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP450) enzymes, for example, citalopram and clopidogrel or transported by the solute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1 (SLCO1B1), for example, atorvastatin and simvastatin, with PGx dosing guidelines, in the context of consumption in Scandinavian countries. A major barrier to the widespread adoption of PGx tests in clinical practice has been healthcare professionals' uncertainty about their efficacy, complexity in result interpretation and questions regarding the evidence base. However, recent studies have demonstrated PGx testing has the potential to improve treatment outcomes, reduce adverse drug reactions and achieve cost savings. These findings underscore the potential of PGx testing as a valuable tool in clinical decision making, promoting its use in a pre-emptive manner to enhance patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.