Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39971605›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Climate footprint of industry-sponsored in-human clinical trials: life cycle assessments of clinical trials spanning multiple phases and disease areas.

Jason Keith LaRoche, Jason Lanier, Rodrigo Alvarenga, Michael Collins, Thomas Costelloe, Annemie Chiau, Hugh Whetherly, Wouter De Soete, Jeremy Faludi, Kristel Rens

7 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It reports registered trial NCT04288778. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04288778 phase4completed

A Prospective, Multi-centric, Open-label, Single-arm, Phase 4 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Canagliflozin + Metformin Hydrochloride IR Fixed-dose Combination as an Adjunct to Diet and Exercise to Improve Glycemic Control in Indian Adult Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus When Treatment With Both Canagliflozin and Metformin is Appropriate

Ran2020Enrolled276Registered outcomes4Posted comparisons0ConditionsDiabetes MellitusArmsCanagliflozin + Metformin hydrochloride (Fixed Dose Combination)
Open the trial in the graph
NCT03277105 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3 Randomized, Multicenter Study of Subcutaneous vs. Intravenous Administration of Daratumumab in Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

TypeinterventionalSponsorJanssen Research & Development, LLCRan2017 to 2024Enrolled522ConditionsMultiple MyelomaArmsDara SC, Dara IV
NCT03473743 phase1 / phase2active not recruitingnot on this map

A Phase 1b-2 Study to Evaluate Safety, Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Various Regimens of Erdafitinib in Subjects With Metastatic or Locally Advanced Urothelial Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorJanssen Research & Development, LLCRan2018 to 2026Enrolled125ConditionsUrothelial CarcinomaArmsErdafitinib, Cetrelimab, Cisplatin, Carboplatin
NCT04072575 phase3completednot on this map

Single-arm, Open-label Extension to a Double-blind, Randomized, Active-controlled, Parallel-group Study of Paliperidone Palmitate 6-Month Formulation

TypeinterventionalSponsorJanssen Research & Development, LLCRan2019 to 2022Enrolled178ConditionsSchizophreniaArmsPP6M injection Dose 1, PP6M injection Dose 2
NCT04208061 phase1completednot on this map

A Phase 1, 2-Panel, Fixed-Sequence, Open-Label Single-Center Study to Assess the Effect of Single and Multiple Doses of Darunavir in Combination With Cobicistat or Ritonavir on the Pharmacokinetics of Single Dose Dabigatran Etexilate in Healthy Subjects

TypeinterventionalSponsorJanssen Research & Development, LLCRan2019 to 2021Enrolled28ConditionsHealthyArmsDabigatran Etexilate, DRV/COBI, Ritonavir, Darunavir
NCT05070546 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of an Ad26.RSV.preF-based Vaccine in Adults Aged 18 to 59 Years, Including Those at High-risk for Severe RSV

TypeinterventionalSponsorJanssen Vaccines & Prevention B.V.Ran2021 to 2022Enrolled1,124ConditionsRespiratory Syncytial Virus Infection PreventionArmsAd26.RSV.preF-based Vaccine, Placebo
NCT05364554 phase2completednot on this map

A Phase 2b Multicenter, Long-Term Extension, Dose-ranging Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of JNJ-77242113 for the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis

TypeinterventionalSponsorJanssen Research & Development, LLCRan2022 to 2023Enrolled227ConditionsPlaque PsoriasisArmsJNJ-77242113
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jason Keith LaRocheInnovative Health, Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine, Delft, Zuid Holland, The Netherlands jlaroche@its.jnj.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-3162-5735
Jason LanierJohnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine, Spring House, Pennsylvania, USA.
Rodrigo AlvarengaEnvironmental Resources Management, Ghent, Belgium.
Michael CollinsProduct Sustainability, Environmental Resources Management, London, UK.
Thomas CostelloeEnvironmental Resources Management, London, UK.
Annemie ChiauICON plc, Ghent, Belgium.
Hugh WhetherlyEnvironmental Resources Management, London, UK.
Wouter De SoeteJohnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Jeremy FaludiDelft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
Kristel RensJohnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aims to calculate the global warming potential, in carbon dioxide (CO

designThe study design involved a retrospective analysis of completed clinical trials.

settingSelect set of seven clinical trials conducted between 2018 and 2023 and sponsored by Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine: TMC114FD1HTX1002, 77242113PSO2001, 42756493BLC2002, 54767414MMY3012, VAC18193RSV3006, R092670PSY3016 and 28431754DIA4032

participantsWhile participants and the public were involved in all seven trials, the life cycle assessments (LCAs) were performed as an independent retrospective analysis after the clinical trials were completed. As a retrospective analysis, we leveraged clinical trial documentation and interviews with the sponsor trial staff and trial site staff. None of the participating trial subjects were involved specifically in the LCA analysis, nor was any personal identifying information from the trial subjects collected or shared.The underlying clinical trials were performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and Guidelines for Good Pharmacoepidemiology Practice. All participating investigators were required to obtain full governing board approval for conducting research involving humans. Sponsor approval and continuing review were obtained through the appropriate Institutional Review Board/Ethics Committee (IRB) and Health Authority channels. For academic investigative sites that did not receive authorisation to use the central IRB, full board approval was obtained from their respective governing IRBs, and documentation of approval was submitted to Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine, LLC, before the site's participation and initiation of any trial procedures. All registry participants provided written informed consent and authorisation before participating. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: Primary outcome measure CO

resultsThe TMC114FD1HTX1002 phase 1 trial was the smallest trial both in terms of number of patients (39) and sites (1) and had the smallest emissions at 17 648 kgCO

conclusionsBased on our LCAs of seven clinical trials spanning all four phases of development and multiple disease areas, there are five activities that drive no less than 79% of the average clinical trial's GHG footprint. These are drug product manufacture, packaging, and distribution; patient travel; on-site monitoring visit travel; the collection, transport and processing of laboratory samples; and sponsor staff commuting between their homes and the office. Understanding the activities that drive GHG emissions in clinical trials can both guide trial designers in avoiding or minimising reliance on these activities when designing new trials and guide trial sponsors in taking targeted actions to reduce GHG emissions from these activities where their use cannot be avoided. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: TMC114FD1HTX1002 (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04208061), 77242113PSO2001 (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05364554), 42756493BLC2002 (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03473743), 54767414MMY3012 (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03277105), VAC18193RSV3006 (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05070546), R092670PSY3016 (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04072575) and 28431754DIA4032 (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04288778).

Indexed as

Carbon FootprintClinical Trials as TopicDrug IndustryGlobal WarmingCarbon DioxideHumansRetrospective StudiesCarbon DioxideClinical TrialDIABETES & ENDOCRINOLOGYHIV & AIDSIMMUNOLOGYNEUROLOGYONCOLOGY

Identifiers

PMID39971605
PMCPMC11842993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

and 1 more above

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.