ArticleBMJ open2025
Climate footprint of industry-sponsored in-human clinical trials: life cycle assessments of clinical trials spanning multiple phases and disease areas.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It reports registered trial NCT04288778. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prospective, Multi-centric, Open-label, Single-arm, Phase 4 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Canagliflozin + Metformin Hydrochloride IR Fixed-dose Combination as an Adjunct to Diet and Exercise to Improve Glycemic Control in Indian Adult Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus When Treatment With Both Canagliflozin and Metformin is Appropriate
Open the trial in the graphA Phase 3 Randomized, Multicenter Study of Subcutaneous vs. Intravenous Administration of Daratumumab in Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
A Phase 1b-2 Study to Evaluate Safety, Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Various Regimens of Erdafitinib in Subjects With Metastatic or Locally Advanced Urothelial Cancer
Single-arm, Open-label Extension to a Double-blind, Randomized, Active-controlled, Parallel-group Study of Paliperidone Palmitate 6-Month Formulation
A Phase 1, 2-Panel, Fixed-Sequence, Open-Label Single-Center Study to Assess the Effect of Single and Multiple Doses of Darunavir in Combination With Cobicistat or Ritonavir on the Pharmacokinetics of Single Dose Dabigatran Etexilate in Healthy Subjects
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of an Ad26.RSV.preF-based Vaccine in Adults Aged 18 to 59 Years, Including Those at High-risk for Severe RSV
A Phase 2b Multicenter, Long-Term Extension, Dose-ranging Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of JNJ-77242113 for the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Sustainability in Pharmaceutical Research and Development: A Perspective on Opportunities for Clinical Pharmacology and Translational Sciences.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Measuring the carbon footprint of clinical research activities: a scoping review of measurement tools and methods.BMJ open · 2026Article
- From patient to planet: integrating climate impact into a hospital medicine initiative reducing blood urea nitrogen testing.BMJ open quality · 2026Article
- Article
- Evaluating the Environmental Impact of Clinical Research: A Full Life Cycle Analysis of a French Academic Randomised Clinical Trial.Fundamental & clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Time Toxicity of Endocrine-based Oral CDK4/6 Inhibitor Therapies.Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2026Article
- Assessing the carbon footprint of French academic clinical trials using the NIHR method.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Carbon footprint of a sample of clinical trials for people with neurological disorders: cross-sectional analysis.BMJ open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to calculate the global warming potential, in carbon dioxide (CO
designThe study design involved a retrospective analysis of completed clinical trials.
settingSelect set of seven clinical trials conducted between 2018 and 2023 and sponsored by Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine: TMC114FD1HTX1002, 77242113PSO2001, 42756493BLC2002, 54767414MMY3012, VAC18193RSV3006, R092670PSY3016 and 28431754DIA4032
participantsWhile participants and the public were involved in all seven trials, the life cycle assessments (LCAs) were performed as an independent retrospective analysis after the clinical trials were completed. As a retrospective analysis, we leveraged clinical trial documentation and interviews with the sponsor trial staff and trial site staff. None of the participating trial subjects were involved specifically in the LCA analysis, nor was any personal identifying information from the trial subjects collected or shared.The underlying clinical trials were performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and Guidelines for Good Pharmacoepidemiology Practice. All participating investigators were required to obtain full governing board approval for conducting research involving humans. Sponsor approval and continuing review were obtained through the appropriate Institutional Review Board/Ethics Committee (IRB) and Health Authority channels. For academic investigative sites that did not receive authorisation to use the central IRB, full board approval was obtained from their respective governing IRBs, and documentation of approval was submitted to Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine, LLC, before the site's participation and initiation of any trial procedures. All registry participants provided written informed consent and authorisation before participating. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: Primary outcome measure CO
resultsThe TMC114FD1HTX1002 phase 1 trial was the smallest trial both in terms of number of patients (39) and sites (1) and had the smallest emissions at 17 648 kgCO
conclusionsBased on our LCAs of seven clinical trials spanning all four phases of development and multiple disease areas, there are five activities that drive no less than 79% of the average clinical trial's GHG footprint. These are drug product manufacture, packaging, and distribution; patient travel; on-site monitoring visit travel; the collection, transport and processing of laboratory samples; and sponsor staff commuting between their homes and the office. Understanding the activities that drive GHG emissions in clinical trials can both guide trial designers in avoiding or minimising reliance on these activities when designing new trials and guide trial sponsors in taking targeted actions to reduce GHG emissions from these activities where their use cannot be avoided. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: TMC114FD1HTX1002 (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04208061), 77242113PSO2001 (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05364554), 42756493BLC2002 (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03473743), 54767414MMY3012 (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03277105), VAC18193RSV3006 (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05070546), R092670PSY3016 (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04072575) and 28431754DIA4032 (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04288778).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.