ArticleBMJ open2025
Telephonic verbal autopsies among adults in South Africa: a feasibility and acceptability pilot study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis pilot study explores the feasibility and acceptability of using telephonic verbal autopsies (teleVAs) in South Africa to collect information on causes of death.
designQuantitative and qualitative data collection methods were used to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of these telephonic interviews.
settingThe teleVA pilot was conducted in South Africa's Western Cape province. The qualitative component also included two rural South African Population Research Infrastructure Network nodes (Africa Health Research Institute in KwaZulu-Natal and Agincourt in Mpumalanga), which had transitioned to teleVAs during COVID-19, allowing exploration of teleVA's feasibility in both urban and rural settings.
participantsWe recruited 229 respondents to participate in a pilot teleVA. After each VA, VA interviewers filled in a survey to assess their perceptions and discern if they experienced any technical challenges. We also conducted 18 in-depth interviews with both interviewers (n=6) and respondents (n=12) to explore their views on the acceptability of the teleVA. We conducted a thematic analysis of these interviews.
interventionsVA was piloted over the phone, instead of face-to-face. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes focused on the feasibility and acceptability of phone VAs among both interviewers and respondents. Secondary outcomes evaluated the quality of teleVAs.
resultsParticipants expressed willingness to participate in teleVAs, considering them valuable for public health planning and decision-making. The feasibility of collecting next-of-kin information proved challenging, with incomplete or incorrect contact details posing future logistic issues. Only one question out of 76, showed a statistically significant difference in the proportions of non-informative teleVA compared with face-to-face VA.
conclusionsThe study offers valuable insights into using teleVAs to gather cause of death information in resource-limited settings. It highlights the feasibility and acceptability of teleVAs while emphasising the need for comprehensive planning, integration with the civil registration and vital statistics system and community participation enhancement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.