Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39971485›Full record

ArticleActa anaesthesiologica Scandinavica2025

Intraoperative opioid administrations, rescue doses in the post-anaesthesia care unit and clinician-perceived factors for dose adjustments in adults: A Danish nationwide survey.

Trang Xuan Minh Tran, Mik Wetterslev, Anders Kehlet Nørskov, Christian Sylvest Meyhoff, Markus Harboe Olsen, Theis Skovsgaard Itenov, Ole Mathiesen, Anders Peder Højer Karlsen, OPI•AID Collaborator Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Trang Xuan Minh TranDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital-Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-8491-3389
Mik WetterslevDepartment of Intensive Care 4131, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-8798-1133
Anders Kehlet NørskovCentre for Anaesthesiological Research, Department of Anesthesiology, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark.
Christian Sylvest MeyhoffDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital-Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Markus Harboe OlsenCentre for Anaesthesiological Research, Department of Anesthesiology, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark.
Theis Skovsgaard ItenovDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital-Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1204-3636
Ole MathiesenCentre for Anaesthesiological Research, Department of Anesthesiology, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark.
Anders Peder Højer KarlsenDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital-Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-0338-3751
OPI•AID Collaborator Group

Funding

Bispebjerg Hospital
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe impact of demographic- and surgical factors on individual perioperative opioid requirements is not fully understood. Anaesthesia personnel adjust opioid administrations based on their own clinical experience, expert opinions and local guidelines. This survey aimed to assess the current practice of anaesthesia personnel regarding intraoperative opioid treatment for postoperative analgesia and rescue opioid dosing strategies in the post-anaesthesia care unit in Denmark.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional online survey with 37 questions addressing pain management and opioid-dosing strategies. Local site investigators from 46 of 47 public Danish anaesthesia departments distributed the survey. Data collection took place from 5 February to 30 April 2024.

resultsOf the 4187 survey participants, 2025 (48%) answered. Intra- and postoperative opioid doses were adjusted based on chronic pain, age, preoperative opioid use, body weight and type of surgery. Between 84% and 89% of respondents adhered to and had perioperative pain management guidelines available. Respondents preferred intraoperative fentanyl (44%) and morphine (36%) to prevent postoperative pain. Median intraoperative intravenous morphine equivalents ranged from 0.12 to 0.38 mg/kg in clinical scenarios. In these cases, the following variables were assembled in different combinations to assess their impact on dosing: age (30 vs. 65 years), sex (female vs. male), ASA score (1 vs. 3) and type of surgery (anterior cruciate ligament vs. laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery). Respondents preferred intravenous morphine and fentanyl for moderate and severe postoperative pain, respectively. Median postoperative rescue doses were 0.06-0.12 mg/kg in clinical scenarios based on shifting combinations of the variables: age (30 vs. 65 years), ASA score (1 vs. 3) and degree of expected pain (moderate vs. severe).

conclusionRespondents preferred fentanyl and morphine for postoperative pain control with considerable variation in choice of opioid and morphine equivalent dose. Respondents expressed that guidelines were highly available and strongly adhered to. Opioid dosing was predominantly guided by chronic pain, age, preoperative opioid use, body weight and type of surgery.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidIntraoperative CarePostoperative PainAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesDenmarkFemaleFentanylHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain ManagementPractice Patterns, Physicians'Surveys and QuestionnairesAnalgesics, OpioidFentanylanalgesicsopioidspain managementpostoperative painsurvey

Identifiers

PMID39971485
PMCPMC11839308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.