Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39971361›Full record

ArticleZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery2025

[Study on assessment methods for acetabular cup size in total hip arthroplasty].

Jinzi Wang, Wenju Chang, Pei Zhang, Xiang Li, Yong Zhang, Shuoshuo Zhang, Hai Ding

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jinzi WangDepartment of Orthopedics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu Anhui, 233000, P. R. China.
Wenju ChangDepartment of Orthopedics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu Anhui, 233000, P. R. China.
Pei ZhangDepartment of Orthopedics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu Anhui, 233000, P. R. China.
Xiang LiDepartment of Orthopedics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu Anhui, 233000, P. R. China.
Yong ZhangDepartment of Orthopedics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu Anhui, 233000, P. R. China.
Shuoshuo ZhangDepartment of Orthopedics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu Anhui, 233000, P. R. China.
Hai DingDepartment of Orthopedics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu Anhui, 233000, P. R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate precise assessment methods for predicting the optimal acetabular cup size in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods: A clinical data of 73 patients (80 hips) who underwent primary THA between December 2022 and July 2024 and met the inclusion criteria was analyzed. There were 39 males and 34 females with an average age of 66.3 years (range, 56-78 years). Among them, 66 cases were unilateral THA and 7 were bilateral THAs. There were 29 patients (34 hips) of osteoarthritis, 35 patients (35 hips) of femoral neck fractures, and 9 patients (11 hips) of osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Based on anteroposterior pelvic X-ray films, three methods were employed to predict acetabular cup size, including preoperative template planning, radiographic femoral head diameter (FHD) measurement, and intraoperative FHD measurement. The predicted acetabular cup sizes from these methods were compared with the actual implanted sizes. Results: The predicted acetabular cup sizes using the preoperative template planning, radiographic FHD measurement, and intraoperative FHD measurement were (51.25±2.81), (49.72±3.11), and (49.90±2.74) mm, respectively, compared to the actual implanted cup size of (50.57±2.74) mm, with no significant difference ( Conclusion: The intraoperative FHD measurement, as a simple, cost-effective, and accurate method, effectively guides acetabular cup selection, reduces the risk of prosthesis wear, enhances postoperative joint stability.

Indexed as

AcetabulumArthroplasty, Replacement, HipHip ProsthesisProsthesis DesignAgedFemaleFemoral Neck FracturesFemur HeadFemur Head NecrosisHumansMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, HipRadiographyacetabular cuppreoperative measurementprosthesisTotal hip arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID39971361
PMCPMC11839284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.