Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39971341›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2025

Amino Acid Properties, Substitution Rates, and the Nearly Neutral Theory.

Jennifer E James, Martin Lascoux

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jennifer E JamesDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, SciLifeLab, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-0518-6783
Martin LascouxDepartment of Ecology and Genetics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1699-9042

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Do the properties of amino acids affect their rates of substitution? The neutral theory predicts that greater selective constraint leads to slower rates of evolution; similarly, we expect amino acids that are more different from each other to have lower rates of exchange because such changes are most likely to affect protein structure and function. Here, we test these predictions, using substitution rates estimated from empirical amino acid exchangeability matrices. To measure degree of amino acid difference, we focused on two physicochemical properties, charge and size, uncorrelated metrics that are known to have important implications for protein structure and function. We find that for both charge and size, amino acid pairs with large differences had lower rates of substitution. We also found that amino acids that differed in both properties had the lowest rates of substitution, suggesting that both physicochemical properties are under selective constraint. Mutation properties, such as the number of mutations or the number of transitions as opposed to transversions separating amino acid pairs, were also important predictors of substitution rates. The relationship between amino acid substitution rates and differences in their physiochemical properties holds across several taxonomically restricted datasets. This finding suggests that purifying selection affects amino acid substitution rates in a similar manner across taxonomic groups with different effective population sizes.

Indexed as

Amino AcidsAmino Acid SubstitutionEvolution, MolecularModels, GeneticSelection, GeneticAmino Acidsamino acidsmutationsphysicochemical propertiesselective constraintsubstitution rates

Identifiers

PMID39971341
PMCPMC11884779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.