Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39971325›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of ophthalmology2025

Key strategies to reduce the global burden of myopia: consensus from the international myopia summit.

Leila Sara Eppenberger, Amanda Davis, Serge Resnikoff, Tien Yin Wong, Weizhong Lan, Seang-Mei Saw, Ming Guang He, Kyoko Ohno-Matsui, Jost B Jonas, Jia Qu and 2 more

Abstract readReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Early Axial Length Response Predicts Long-Term Myopia Control in Children Undergoing Orthokeratology.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Myopia Awareness in Australia: Insights from a Nationwide Survey.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Article
  6. Artificial intelligence in pediatric myopia - a narrative review.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Leila Sara EppenbergerOcular Imaging Research Group, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9336-8941
Amanda DavisInternational Agency for the Prevention of Blindness, London, UK.
Serge ResnikoffSOVS, UNSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5866-4446
Tien Yin WongTsinghua University, Beijing, Beijing, China.
Weizhong LanAier Institute, Changsha, Hunan, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3829-7415
Seang-Mei SawSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7166-796X
Ming Guang HeSun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Kyoko Ohno-MatsuiOphthalmology and Visual Science, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Bunkyo-ku, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8375-6879
Jost B JonasTsinghua University, Beijing, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2972-5227
Jia QuEye Hospital and School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical College, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5712-5248
International Myopia Summit Workgroup
Marcus AngSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore marcus.ang@snec.com.sg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3022-0795

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, we describe key strategies to guide global collaborative efforts to further reduce the burden of myopia and myopia-related visual impairment. A modified Delphi method was applied as an iterative multistage process to collect expert and stakeholders' opinions and extract consensus strategies regarding myopia diagnosis, prevention and control. Anonymous pre-meeting preparation rounds, structured discussions for prioritisation and the development of key consensus areas were performed. Consensus was reached on three key areas to collaborate and complement existing frameworks: (1) Myopia defined not only as a refractive error but also as a disease with phenotypic features allowing for risk stratification of significant visual impairment. (2) In addition to preventive strategies, a focus is needed on preventing progression to high myopia (HM). (3) A focus on preventing and treating pathologic myopia (PM), that is, end-stage of myopia disease with irreversible visual impairment. In conclusion, the workgroup suggests a global, collaborative strategy that is needed across public health, healthcare and advocacy sectors to support efforts in reducing visual impairment from myopia. Complementary to existing preventive public health efforts, additional focus on defining myopia as a disease with risk stratification for visual impairment and an emphasis on reducing visual impairment associated with HM and PM should be considered.

Indexed as

MyopiaDelphi TechniqueDisease ProgressionGlobal HealthHumansChild health (paediatrics)EpidemiologyPublic healthTreatment MedicalVision

Identifiers

PMID39971325
PMCPMC12171485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.