ArticleQJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians2025
A United Kingdom nationally representative survey of public attitudes towards pharmacogenomics.
Article in QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perceptions of Pharmacogenomic Testing Among People With Treatment Resistant Depression: Legitimization as a Facilitator of Acceptance.Journal of genetic counseling · 2026Article
- The Australian Public's Awareness, Knowledge and Perspectives Towards Pharmacogenomics: A Nationwide Survey, and Semi-Structured Interviews.Clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Consistency and clarity of pharmacogenomic guidance in UK medicine patient information leaflets: A cross-sectional analysis.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Survey to inform personalised prescribing in a British South Asian community: pharmacogenomics and traditional medicine use.BMC medicine · 2026Article
- Cancer patients' perspectives and practices regarding pharmacogenomic testing and its cost.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Public awareness, attitudes, and concerns regarding pharmacogenomics in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: an exploratory online cross-sectional survey.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Pharmacogenomics in pediatric oncology: Australian adolescent or young adult and caregiver perspectives.Genetics in medicine open · 2025Article
- Patient and clinician perspectives on pharmacogenetic testing for antipsychotics.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundVariation in DNA is known to contribute to medication response, impacting both medicine effectiveness and incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). However, clinical implementation of pharmacogenomics (PGx) has been slow, and the views of the public are not well understood.
aimTo assess UK national public attitudes around pharmacogenetics. DESIGN AND
methodsThe survey was co-designed with the Participant Panel at Genomics England and the data were collected by the National Centre for Social Research, using its nationally representative panel of UK adults. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to analyse relationships between selected survey reported variables, controlled for age and sex.
resultsThe survey response rate was 58%. Two thousand seven hundred and nineteen responses were obtained. Most respondents (59%) had experienced either no benefit or a side effect. Forty-five per cent of respondents reported having experienced no benefit and 46% of respondents reported having experienced a side effect, with female respondents more likely to be in both groups (P < 0.0001). Despite variability in interindividual medicine response being well understood (89%), the involvement of DNA in predicting benefit or risk of a side effect is not (understood by 52% and 48%, respectively). Eighty-nine per cent would complete a PGx test, with 91% wanting direct access to this information. Eighty-five per cent of UK adults think that the NHS should offer PGx to those regularly taking many medicines. Respondents were not more worried overall about misuse of PGx data compared with other routine medical data. Experience with prescription medication impacted on views with those who were prescribed medication almost twice as likely to want a PGx test for any reason.
conclusionMost respondents reported experience with either a medication not working for them or ADRs. There was a high level of understanding of variable medication response but a relatively low level of awareness of the role genetics plays in that variability. Most respondents would want a PGx test, to have direct access to results, and think the NHS should offer this form of testing. Importantly, respondents were not more concerned about PGx data use than that of any other routinely generated medical data. Notably, this study highlights a relationship between individuals' experiences with prescription medications and their interest in PGx testing, underscoring the potential for personalized medicine to address public healthcare needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.