Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39971322›Full record

ArticleQJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians2025

A United Kingdom nationally representative survey of public attitudes towards pharmacogenomics.

Emma F Magavern, Gabriel Marengo, Participant Panel at Genomics England, Chujan Sivathasan, Marta Mezzanzanica, Alison J Wright, Jessica Keen, Videha Sharma, John H McDermott, Claire Duckett and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Emma F MagavernWilliam Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0699-6411
Gabriel MarengoWilliam Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Participant Panel at Genomics England
Chujan SivathasanThe National Centre for Social Research, London, UK.
Marta MezzanzanicaThe National Centre for Social Research, London, UK.
Alison J WrightSchool of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Jessica KeenNHS North West Genomic Medicine Service Alliance, UK.
Videha SharmaDivision of Informatics, Imaging and Data Science, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
John H McDermottManchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Claire DuckettGenomics England Ltd, London, UK.
Dave McCormickGenomics England Ltd, London, UK.
Shelley SimmondsGenomics England Ltd, London, UK.
Emma WaltersGenomics England Ltd, London, UK.
National Centre for Social Research Team
John WeinmanSchool of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Vivienne ParryGenomics England Ltd, London, UK.
William G NewmanManchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Mark J CaulfieldWilliam Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

Funding

Barts CharityBarts NIHR BRCManchester NIHR Biomedical Research Centre BRCNHSNHS England Genomics ProgrammePharmacogenomics and Medicines Optimisation Network of ExcellenceWellcome Trust 203956
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVariation in DNA is known to contribute to medication response, impacting both medicine effectiveness and incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). However, clinical implementation of pharmacogenomics (PGx) has been slow, and the views of the public are not well understood.

aimTo assess UK national public attitudes around pharmacogenetics. DESIGN AND

methodsThe survey was co-designed with the Participant Panel at Genomics England and the data were collected by the National Centre for Social Research, using its nationally representative panel of UK adults. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to analyse relationships between selected survey reported variables, controlled for age and sex.

resultsThe survey response rate was 58%. Two thousand seven hundred and nineteen responses were obtained. Most respondents (59%) had experienced either no benefit or a side effect. Forty-five per cent of respondents reported having experienced no benefit and 46% of respondents reported having experienced a side effect, with female respondents more likely to be in both groups (P < 0.0001). Despite variability in interindividual medicine response being well understood (89%), the involvement of DNA in predicting benefit or risk of a side effect is not (understood by 52% and 48%, respectively). Eighty-nine per cent would complete a PGx test, with 91% wanting direct access to this information. Eighty-five per cent of UK adults think that the NHS should offer PGx to those regularly taking many medicines. Respondents were not more worried overall about misuse of PGx data compared with other routine medical data. Experience with prescription medication impacted on views with those who were prescribed medication almost twice as likely to want a PGx test for any reason.

conclusionMost respondents reported experience with either a medication not working for them or ADRs. There was a high level of understanding of variable medication response but a relatively low level of awareness of the role genetics plays in that variability. Most respondents would want a PGx test, to have direct access to results, and think the NHS should offer this form of testing. Importantly, respondents were not more concerned about PGx data use than that of any other routinely generated medical data. Notably, this study highlights a relationship between individuals' experiences with prescription medications and their interest in PGx testing, underscoring the potential for personalized medicine to address public healthcare needs.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePharmacogeneticsPublic OpinionAdolescentAdultAgedDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited KingdomYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39971322
PMCPMC12419794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.