Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39970941›Full record

ArticleThe Angle orthodontist2025

Effect of miniscrew-assisted maxillary protraction on width changes in the circummaxillary sutures.

Myung Hyun Cho, Youn-Kyung Choi, Sung-Hun Kim, Seong-Sik Kim, Hae Ryoun Park, Yong-Il Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Angle orthodontist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Myung Hyun Cho
Youn-Kyung Choi
Sung-Hun Kim
Seong-Sik Kim
Hae Ryoun Park
Yong-Il Kim

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate changes in the width of five circummaxillary sutures after miniscrew-assisted maxillary protraction (MAMP) and to identify which of them are most significantly affected. MATERIALS AND

methodsCone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) performed before and after MAMP treatment was used to assess the sutural and cephalometric changes in growing patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion (n = 17). CBCT-generated lateral cephalograms were analyzed for skeletal and dental changes. Width changes in the five circummaxillary sutures (frontomaxillary, pterygomaxillary, zygomaticofrontal, zygomaticomaxillary, and zygomaticotemporal) were measured before and after MAMP. Suture widths were measured using ImageJ software on CBCT images. The pre- and post-MAMP mean values of the bilateral width changes were compared. The magnitude of the width changes of the five circummaxillary sutures were ranked to identify the most substantially altered sutures. Statistical significance was determined using the Friedman test.

resultsIn the CBCT-generated lateral cephalometric analysis, statistically significant increases were observed in SNA and ANB values, with the most pronounced results seen in overjet (P < 0.05). After MAMP, all five circummaxillary sutures demonstrated a statistically significant increase in width. The zygomaticofrontal, pterygomaxillary, and zygomaticotemporal sutures exhibited significant changes, with the zygomaticofrontal suture showing the greatest increase in width.

conclusionsAmong patients with Class III malocclusion treated with MAMP, the most pronounced width increase was observed in the zygomaticofrontal suture, whereas the frontomaxillary suture exhibited the least change.

Indexed as

Bone ScrewsCranial SuturesMalocclusion, Angle Class IIIMaxillaOrthodontic Anchorage ProceduresAdolescentCephalometryChildCone-Beam Computed TomographyFemaleHumansMalePalatal Expansion TechniqueCBCTMaxillary protractionSuture

Identifiers

PMID39970941
PMCPMC12017546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.