ArticleHeart & lung : the journal of critical care
Natriuretic peptide testing in veterans hospitalized with heart failure: Potential differences by sex.
Article in Heart & lung : the journal of critical care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNatriuretic peptide testing (NPT) is recommended to assist in diagnosis and prognostication during heart failure hospitalization (HFH). NPT on admission for HFH and sex-based variation in NPT are unknown.
objectivesWe investigated the utilization of NPT among Veterans with HFH, evaluated for sex-based differences, and examined associations with demographic, clinical, and facility characteristics.
methodsAmong Veterans with HFH in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System between October 2015-September 2020, we assessed the rate of NPT on admission and sex-based differences in NPT. We determined associations with demographic, clinical covariates, (comorbidities, laboratory values, loop diuretic use), and facility characteristics using logistic regression.
resultsOf 55,935 patients with HFH (women=1237 (2.2 %)), women were younger (68.3 versus 72.8 years, p < 0.001), less likely to have cardiac comorbidities, and more likely to have ejection fraction >40 %. Admission NPT occurred in 78.3 % of patients (men=78.4 %, women=74.7 %; p = 0.002). In adjusted analyses for clinical and facility-related factors, women were 15 % less likely to receive NPT compared with men [odds ratio =0.85, 95 % CI (0.75, 0.98)]. In sex-stratified models, atrial fibrillation and prior loop diuretic use were associated with increased likelihood of NPT and previous NPT was associated with decreased likelihood in both sexes. Overall associations were similar in both sexes.
conclusionsWomen were less likely to receive NPT during HFH compared to men, potentially risking greater delays in HF diagnosis and treatment. Further investigation should examine the impact of the absence of admission NPT on clinical outcomes and identify strategies to improve obtaining NPT in all patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.