ArticleJournal of biomechanics2025
Estimating temporal bone-implant stresses in patients with bone-anchored lower limbs.
Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evidence-based recommendation of a powered knee for transfemoral bone-anchored prostheses: A cross-sectional study.Canadian prosthetics & orthotics journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bone-anchored limbs (BALs) are a transformative alternative for patients with lower-limb amputation who suffer from debilitating socket problems by eliminating the need for skin-to-prosthetic contact. Despite its successes, some individuals continue to face challenges with BALs, experiencing a loss of implant integration resulting in prosthetic loosening. A thorough understanding of biomechanical behavior at the residual limb and bone-implant interface is necessary to fully understand mechanical failure mechanisms. In addition, a deeper understanding of BAL biomechanical behavior would allow clinicians and researchers to predict and test different implant geometries, inform patient eligibility, rehabilitation strategies, and implantation methods in a safe and low-cost way. Thus, this study designed an innovative simulation method to quantify the temporal mechanical behavior of the residual limb in transfemoral and transtibial BALs by using subject-specific kinematics, musculoskeletal loads, and bone geometry and health. Our novel method was applied to two patients (one transtibial, one transfemoral) with similar BMI and age during level ground walking. Our results demonstrated a pattern of higher residual limb stresses in the transtibial model (26.80 MPa vs. 23.69 MPa). This study not only furthers our understanding of BAL biomechanics but introduces a versatile subject-specific methodology with direct applications in clinical practice. As we navigate the complexities of BAL implantation, this modeling platform lays the groundwork for more informed decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.