ArticlePLoS computational biology2025
Compression-enabled interpretability of voxelwise encoding models.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Compact deep neural network models of visual cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Voxelwise encoding models based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are widely used as predictive models of brain activity evoked by natural movies. Despite their superior predictive performance, the huge number of parameters in CNN-based models have made them difficult to interpret. Here, we investigate whether model compression can build more interpretable and more stable CNN-based voxelwise models while maintaining accuracy. We used multiple compression techniques to prune less important CNN filters and connections, a receptive field compression method to select receptive fields with optimal center and size, and principal component analysis to reduce dimensionality. We demonstrate that the model compression improves the accuracy of identifying visual stimuli in a hold-out test set. Additionally, compressed models offer a more stable interpretation of voxelwise pattern selectivity than uncompressed models. Finally, the receptive field-compressed models reveal that the optimal model-based population receptive fields become larger and more centralized along the ventral visual pathway. Overall, our findings support using model compression to build more interpretable voxelwise models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.