ArticlePloS one2025
Evaluating the structure-based virtual screening performance of SARS-CoV-2 main protease: A benchmarking approach and a multistage screening example against the wild-type and Omicron variants.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Benchmarking docking and ML re-scoring screening performance for KRAS G12D in pancreatic cancer.Molecular diversity · 2026Article
- Benchmarking the Structure-Based Virtual Screening Performance of Wild-Type and ResistantDrug design, development and therapy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
COVID-19 still poses a worldwide health threat due to continuous viral mutations and potential resistance to vaccination. SARS-CoV-2 viral multiplication hindrance by inhibiting the viral main protease (Mpro) deemed propitious. Structure-based virtual screening (SBVS) is a conventional strategy for discovering new inhibitors. Nonetheless, the SBVS efforts against Mpro variants needed to be benchmarked. Herein, in the first stage of the study, we evaluated four docking tools (FRED, PLANTS, AutoDock Vina and CDOCKER) via an in-depth benchmarking approach against SARS-CoV2 Mpro of both the wild type (WTMpro) and the deadly Omicron P132H variant (OMpro). We started by compiling an active dataset of non-covalent small molecule inhibitors of the WTMpro from literature and the COVID-Moonshot database along with generating a high-quality benchmark set via DEKOIS 2.0. pROC-Chemotype plots revealed superior performance for AutoDock Vina against WTMpro, while both FRED and AutoDock Vina demonstrated excellent performance for OMPro. In the second stage, VS was performed on a focused library of 636 compounds transformed from the early-enriched cluster related to perampanel via a scaffold hopping approach. Subsequently, molecular dynamics (MD) simulation and MM GBSA calculations validated the binding potential of the recommended hits against both explored targets. This study provides an example of how to conduct an in-depth benchmarking approach for both WTMPro and OMPro variants and offering an evaluated SBVS protocol for them both.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.