ArticlePloS one2025
Mapping women's work in India: An application of small area estimation.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUnderstanding variations in women's work participation at lower administrative levels, such as districts, is a missing link in identifying trends, patterns and variation that can offer insights into this long-term stagnation. We link data from the 2019-21 Indian National Family Health Survey and the 2011 Indian Population and Housing Census to generate estimates of women's work within 640 districts of India, and to examine the spatial clustering of women's work across these districts. We examine women's work through three outcome variables, namely, district-level estimates of 1) percentage of women who worked in the past 12 months, 2) percentage of women who were self-employed in the past 12 months, and 3) percentage of women who earned cash in the past 12 months.
resultsDiagnostic measures confirm that our model-based estimates are robust enough to provide reliable district-level estimates of women's work in India. Women's work and cash earnings were lowest in the districts of the central, eastern, and northern regions, and highest in the southern region. Self-employment rates for women were generally low in Indian districts, except for districts in Himachal Pradesh and the north-eastern region.
conclusionsConsiderable spatial heterogeneity in women's work has been found across 640 districts of India. Our study demonstrates that estimated percentage of women who worked in the past 12 months, estimated percentage of women who earned cash in the past 12 months and estimated percentage of women who were self-employed in the past 12 months all vary substantially at the district level. Having only state-level estimates may thus be inadequate to inform efforts to remediate low levels of women's work in India. The insights from our current study may help in the formulation and implementation of targeted policies that increase opportunities for women to expand their paid work in India.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.