SynthesisPloS one2025
Potential blood biomarkers that can be used as prognosticators of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
- Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage.Neurocritical care · 2026Article
- Association of Clinical Scores and Cardiac Troponin I with 30-Day Mortality in Patients with Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage.Epidemiologia (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Rhein Inhibits NLRP3 Activation and Alleviates Microglial Pyroptosis After Intracerebral Hemorrhage in Rats.Brain and behavior · 2026Article
- Study on plasma exosome miRNA sequencing and analysis in rats under hemorrhagic stress.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Systemic inflammatory biomarkers CAR and IL-6: correlation with neurological deficit and short-term prognosis of intracerebral hemorrhage.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- The predictive value of the leuko-glycemic index in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage patients undergoing neurosurgical operation: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- Pilot Exploratory Analysis of Serum Gonadal Hormones, Inflammatory Proteins, and Intracerebral Hemorrhage Outcomes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Prognostic Implication of Serum Mixed Lineage Kinase Domain-Like Protein in Acute Primary Supratentorial Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study.Brain and behavior · 2025Article
- Article
- Current approaches to predicting intraventricular hemorrhage in preterm neonates using blood biomarkers.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPredicting nontraumatic spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH) patient prognosis has been commonly practiced, particularly when providing informed consent and considering surgical treatment. Biomarkers might provide more real-time evaluation of SICH patients' condition than clinical prognostic scoring systems. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability of blood biomarkers in predicting prognosis in SICH patients by systematic review and meta-analysis.
methodsStudies that evaluated the association of blood biomarker(s) with mortality and/or functional outcome in SICH patients up to October 11, 2024, were identified through PubMed, Google Scholars, Scopus databases, and reference lists. Studies that satisfied the inclusion criteria were included in the meta-analyses. Good functional outcome was defined by patient's Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) ≥ 4 or modified Rankin scale mRS ≤ 2. Blood biomarkers were classified into the following categories: angiogenic factors, growth factors, inflammatory biomarkers, coagulation parameters, blood counts, and others. Individual meta-analysis was performed for every evaluation endpoint:7 days, 30 days, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year. Meta-analyses were performed using Random Effect Mean-Difference with a 95% Confidence Interval for continuous data and visualized as forest plots in RevMan version 5.3 software. Cochrane Tool to Assess Risk of Bias in Cohort Studies was used to assess potential risk of bias of the included studies. GRADE Profiler was used to assess quality of evidence.
resultsSeventy-seven studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Surviving SICH patients have significantly lower C-reactive protein (CRP), D-dimer, copeptin, S100β, white blood cell (WBC), monocyte, and glucose than non-surviving patients. SICH patients with good functional outcome have lower D-dimer, Interleukin 6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), WBC count, neutrophil count, monocyte count, copeptin and significantly higher lymphocyte counts and calcium levels. Out of all blood biomarkers that were evaluated, only S100β and copeptin had very high effect size and high certainty of evidence.
conclusionIt is interesting to notice that many blood biomarkers significantly associated with SICH patients' outcomes are related to inflammatory responses. This suggests that modulation of inflammation might be essential to improve SICH patients' prognosis. We confidently concluded that S100β and copeptin are the most reliable blood biomarkers that can be used as prognosticators in SICH patients. On other biomarkers, in addition to heterogeneities and inconsistencies, several factors might affect the conclusions of current meta-analysis; thus, future studies to increase the certainties of evidence and effect size on other biomarkers are crucial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.