ArticlePloS one2025
Development of lifestyle assessment: A Delphi survey of multi-faceted health experts.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveIn the field of health promotion, there's a growing focus on adopting an academic approach to assess and evaluate the intricate and ever-evolving nature of lifestyles. This approach is crucial for shaping and improving a healthy way of life. Systematic measurement of lifestyles is essential for enhancing overall health and well-being, encompassing physical, mental, and social dimensions. This study's goal is to create an assessment tool that measures the diversity and intensity of lifestyle behaviors linked to human health. Our efforts involved developing quantitative measurement items that encompass the holistic concepts of health and lifestyle and validating them.
methodsBetween March and April 2023, we gathered insights from 14 experts in lifestyle and health. Building on previous research, we conducted a Delphi survey twice. In the initial survey, we collected expert opinions through open and closed-ended questions about lifestyle evaluation items. After the first survey, we corrected several items that didn't meet the Content Validity Ratio (CVR) standard before proceeding. We presented the first survey's findings to an expert panel, leading to a consensus.
resultsThe initial Delphi round produced 76 items, and the second round resulted in 72 items after adjusting those with CVR scores of 0.51 or less. The final Content Validity Ratio was 0.83, signifying a robust validation process, with a convergence of 0.50 and a consensus level of 0.75.
conclusionIn summary, this study successfully developed a comprehensive lifestyle assessment tool using a modified Delphi technique. The 72 items are categorized into eight subcategories and four overarching themes. This tool provides a systematic approach to evaluate lifestyles, promoting health and well-being across physical, mental, and social dimensions. It also assists in identifying specific lifestyle elements that require more in-depth intervention strategies, all while preserving the academic integrity of the content.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.