Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39970014›Full record

ReviewComprehensive reviews in food science and food safety2025

Environmental conditions and nutritional quality of vegetables in protected cultivation.

Nazim S Gruda, Giedrė Samuolienė, Jinlong Dong, Xun Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Environmental conditions and nutritional quality of vegetables in protected cultivation.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nazim S GrudaInstitute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation, Division of Horticultural Sciences, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2663-1594
Giedrė SamuolienėLithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Akademija, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0003-1085-1004
Jinlong DongState Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7800-6750
Xun LiState Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1926-616X

Funding

the Jiangsu Agriculture Science and Technology Innovation Fund (JASTIF) CX(23)3108the Key-Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province 2020B0202010006the National Natural Science Foundation of China 42207357the National Natural Science Foundation of China 42477379the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province BK20211399the re-qualification of the Spanish University System, Maria Zambrano modality, funded by Ministerio de Universidades and the 'European Union NextGenerationEU/PRTR'
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite progress in reducing global hunger, micronutrient deficiencies and imbalanced diets linked to urbanization remain pressing health threats. Protected cultivation offers a promising avenue for sustainable intensification of vegetable production. Additionally, indoor and vertical farming have recently emerged as cutting-edge strategies, particularly in densely populated urban areas and mega-cities. However, research has focused on maximizing yield, neglecting the impact of pre-harvest conditions on produce quality. Here, we explore strategies for manipulating environmental factors within protected cultivation systems to enhance vegetable nutritional value. Research suggests moderate stress can positively influence nutrient composition while plants exhibit stage-specific metabolic responses to environmental factors. For instance, seedlings thrive under a higher blue-to-red ratio, while green light benefits leafy vegetables. Additionally, increased blue light or supplemental UV-A benefits flowering and fruiting vegetables. When other environmental factors are optimal, light intensity significantly impacts vegetable nutritional quality, followed by CO

Indexed as

EnvironmentNutritive ValueVegetablesAgricultureclimate changescontrolled environmentenvironmental factorshuman nutritionvegetable quality

Identifiers

PMID39970014
PMCPMC11838150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.