Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39970004›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2025

A novel dataset for nuclei and tissue segmentation in melanoma with baseline nuclei segmentation and tissue segmentation benchmarks.

Mark Schuiveling, Hong Liu, Daniel Eek, Gerben E Breimer, Karijn P M Suijkerbuijk, Willeke A M Blokx, Mitko Veta

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mark SchuivelingDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 CG Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2631-7271
Hong LiuMedical Image Analysis, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5600 MB Eindhoven, the Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0004-7943-6399
Daniel EekMedical Image Analysis, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5600 MB Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Gerben E BreimerDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 CG Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0365-3667
Karijn P M SuijkerbuijkDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 CG Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3604-5430
Willeke A M BlokxDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 CG Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4647-8830
Mitko VetaMedical Image Analysis, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5600 MB Eindhoven, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1711-3098

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMelanoma is an aggressive form of skin cancer in which tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are a biomarker for recurrence and treatment response. Manual TIL assessment is prone to interobserver variability, and current deep learning models are not publicly accessible or have low performance. Deep learning models, however, have the potential of consistent spatial evaluation of TILs and other immune cell subsets with the potential of improved prognostic and predictive value. To make the development of these models possible, we created the Panoptic Segmentation of nUclei and tissue in advanced MelanomA (PUMA) dataset and assessed the performance of several state-of-the-art deep learning models. In addition, we show how to improve model performance further by using heuristic postprocessing in which nuclei classes are updated based on their tissue localization.

resultsThe PUMA dataset includes 155 primary and 155 metastatic melanoma hematoxylin and eosin-stained regions of interest with nuclei and tissue annotations from a single melanoma referral institution. The Hover-NeXt model, trained on the PUMA dataset, demonstrated the best performance for lymphocyte detection, approaching human interobserver agreement. In addition, heuristic postprocessing of deep learning models improved the detection of noncommon classes, such as epithelial nuclei.

conclusionThe PUMA dataset is the first melanoma-specific dataset that can be used to develop melanoma-specific nuclei and tissue segmentation models. These models can, in turn, be used for prognostic and predictive biomarker development. Incorporating tissue and nuclei segmentation is a step toward improved deep learning nuclei segmentation performance. To support the development of these models, this dataset is used in the PUMA challenge.

Indexed as

Cell NucleusImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMelanomaSkin NeoplasmsBenchmarkingDeep LearningHumansLymphocytes, Tumor-InfiltratingPrognosisH&E-stained histopathologyMelanomanuclei segmentationTILstissue segmentation

Identifiers

PMID39970004
PMCPMC11837757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.