Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39969972›Full record

Trial reportJMIR formative research2025

Digital Solution to Support Medication Adherence and Self-Management in Patients with Cancer (SAMSON): Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Thu Ha Dang, Nilmini Wickramasinghe, Prem Prakash Jayaraman, Kate Burbury, Marliese Alexander, Ashley Whitechurch, Mitchell Dyer, Stephen Quinn, Abdur Rahim Mohammad Forkan, Penelope Schofield

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JMIR formative research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. From optimistic to overwhelmed: exploring health beliefs and barriers to oral anticancer medication adherence among cancer survivors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Thu Ha DangDepartment of Psychological Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9105-6920
Nilmini WickramasingheOptus Chair Digital Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1314-8843
Prem Prakash JayaramanFactory of the Future and Digital Innovation Lab, Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering, School Software and Electrical Engineering, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4500-3443
Kate BurburyTasmanian Health Services, Department of Health, Hobart, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6710-681X
Marliese AlexanderSir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5782-7912
Ashley WhitechurchSir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1635-5562
Mitchell DyerPharmacy Department, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0009-0007-3296-6239
Stephen QuinnDepartment of Health Science and Biostatistics, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1306-9686
Abdur Rahim Mohammad ForkanDigital Innovation Lab, Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering, School Software and Electrical Engineering, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0237-1705
Penelope SchofieldSir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9495-9543

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedication nonadherence is a serious problem in cancer, potentially impacts patients' health outcomes and health care costs. Although technology-based medication adherence (MA) interventions have emerged, evidence supporting their quality and effectiveness remains limited.

objectiveThis study tested the acceptability, feasibility, and potential effects of Safety and Adherence to Medications and Self-care Advice in Oncology (SAMSON), a digital solution designed to support MA and self-management in cancer.

methodsA 12-week, 2-arm, unblinded, pragmatic pilot randomized controlled trial was conducted. Adults with hematological malignancies who started oral cancer medicines within the last 12 months were recruited from a metropolitan specialized hospital and randomized 1:1 to SAMSON or control (usual care). The SAMSON solution included a smartphone app with tailored alerts and real-time self-care advice, a web-based dashboard for health care professionals (HCPs) to monitor patients' adherence and symptoms, and motivational interviewing (MI) teleconsultations delivered by oncology nurses and pharmacists at baseline and weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12. Primary outcomes were the patients' acceptance of SAMSON, measured by the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology at 12 weeks, and study feasibility, measured by predefined rates of recruitment, randomization, retention, intervention adherence, and outcome assessment completion. Secondary outcomes were comparison of MA and clinical self-assessments through online questionnaires, including adherence, toxicity self-management, anxiety and depression symptoms, and quality of life, measured at baseline and 12 weeks between the 2 arms. Data retrieved from the SAMSON app (Swinburne University of Technology) was analysed for task completion.

resultsA total of 33 patients (79% of those who were approached) consented to participate in the trial. Of those, 31/33 (94%) completed baseline surveys and were randomized to SAMSON (15/31) and control arms (16/31). Of 31 patients, 28 (90%) completed the 12-week surveys (12 SAMSON and 16 control). Overall, patients rated the SAMSON solution as highly acceptable (13/15, 87% app usage; 14/15, 93% MI teleconsultation delivery). They reported that SAMSON was easy to use (10/12, 83%) and helpful in improving their MA (6/12, 50%). All study HCPs reported the SAMSON solution was helpful in supporting patients' MA. Patients completed an average of 99 tasks over the 12-week study period (71% of scheduled tasks). Most patients (10/12, 83%) completed all 5 scheduled consultations. All study feasibility measures were higher than the predefined upper thresholds, except the rate of patients' responses to medication reminders.

conclusionsThe results demonstrated that the SAMSON solution is acceptable, usable, and useful for oncology HCPs and patients with cancer. The SAMSON solution is feasible in real-life oncology settings. Our next steps involve refining the SAMSON solution based on participants' feedback, conducting a large-scale randomized controlled trial to evaluate its clinical and economic effectiveness, and exploring potential commercialization.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12623000472673; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=385728. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079122.

Indexed as

Medication AdherenceMobile ApplicationsNeoplasmsSelf-ManagementAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsTelemedicinecancerdigital solutioneHealthhome-based cancer treatmentmedication adherencemHealthmobile healthmobile phoneoncologyoral chemotherapypatient safetypilot studyquality of liferandomized controlled trialRCTSAMSONself-managementsmartphone app

Identifiers

PMID39969972
PMCPMC11888109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.