Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39969971›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025

Estimating Patient and Family Costs and CO2 Emissions for Telehealth and In-Person Health Care Appointments in British Columbia, Canada: Geospatial Mixed Methods Study.

Graham Mainer-Pearson, Kurtis Stewart, Kim Williams, John Pawlovich, Scott Graham, Linda Riches, Sonya Cressman, Kendall Ho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Graham Mainer-PearsonDigital Emergency Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0009-0009-0027-9340
Kurtis StewartDigital Emergency Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3730-9733
Kim WilliamsRural Coordination Centre of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0009-0001-7855-7939
John PawlovichRural Coordination Centre of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0378-0685
Scott GrahamFirst Nations Health Authority, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0009-0008-5883-7088
Linda RichesPatient Partner Researcher, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0009-0000-3247-1278
Sonya CressmanDigital Emergency Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4769-8082
Kendall HoDigital Emergency Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4936-9031

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients inevitably incur some cost for accessing health care, even in universal systems such as Canada. The COVID-19 pandemic dramatically shifted health care delivery from in-person to telehealth services, also shifting the proportion of costs offset by patients and their families by reducing the need to travel to in-person appointments.

objectiveThis study aimed to develop a method for estimating the costs patients and their families incur and CO

methodsWe present a method to evaluate the costs associated with in-person and telehealth care appointments from the perspective of patients, their families, and the environment. We used ED locations, road distances, and duration of appointment to account for costs paid by patients (ie, lost productivity, informal caregiving, and out-of-pocket expenses) attributed to travel to receive medical care. Costs to the environment were evaluated by calculating the amount of CO

resultsOur method estimates that patients in British Columbia pay up to $300 (2023 CAD, CAD $1=US $0.86) on average to attend an in-person ED visit, depending on where they live; $166 may be attributed to lost productivity, $83 to informal caregiving, and $50 to out-of-pocket expenses. These estimates are higher than most observed cost estimates. In addition, avoiding in-person care diverts up to 13 kg of CO

conclusionsWe present a novel method for estimating patient-incurred costs and CO

Indexed as

Carbon DioxideHealth Care CostsTelemedicineAppointments and SchedulesBritish ColumbiaCOVID-19Emergency Service, HospitalFamilyHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2TravelCarbon DioxideCanadaCO2consultationeconomic evaluationemergency departmentemission costsenvironmental costsfamilygeospatialhealth carehospitalizationinformal caregivinglost productivityout-of-pocket costspatientpatient costspatient-paidphysician visitsensitivity analysistelehealthvirtual carevirtual service

Identifiers

PMID39969971
PMCPMC11888102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.