Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39969874›Full record

ArticleJAMA psychiatry2025

Predicting Diagnostic Progression to Schizophrenia or Bipolar Disorder via Machine Learning.

Lasse Hansen, Martin Bernstorff, Kenneth Enevoldsen, Sara Kolding, Jakob Grøhn Damgaard, Erik Perfalk, Kristoffer Laigaard Nielbo, Andreas Aalkjær Danielsen, Søren Dinesen Østergaard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Big data and psychiatry: advances, constraints and future directions.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Artificial Intelligence-Empowered Multimodal Learning in Psychiatry: A Scoping Review.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lasse HansenDepartment of Affective Disorders, Aarhus University Hospital-Psychiatry, Aarhus, Denmark.
Martin BernstorffDepartment of Affective Disorders, Aarhus University Hospital-Psychiatry, Aarhus, Denmark.
Kenneth EnevoldsenDepartment of Affective Disorders, Aarhus University Hospital-Psychiatry, Aarhus, Denmark.
Sara KoldingDepartment of Affective Disorders, Aarhus University Hospital-Psychiatry, Aarhus, Denmark.
Jakob Grøhn DamgaardDepartment of Affective Disorders, Aarhus University Hospital-Psychiatry, Aarhus, Denmark.
Erik PerfalkDepartment of Affective Disorders, Aarhus University Hospital-Psychiatry, Aarhus, Denmark.
Kristoffer Laigaard NielboCenter for Humanities Computing, Department of Culture and Society, Aarhus, Denmark.
Andreas Aalkjær DanielsenDepartment of Affective Disorders, Aarhus University Hospital-Psychiatry, Aarhus, Denmark.
Søren Dinesen ØstergaardDepartment of Affective Disorders, Aarhus University Hospital-Psychiatry, Aarhus, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The diagnosis of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder is often delayed several years despite illness typically emerging in late adolescence or early adulthood, which impedes initiation of targeted treatment. Objective: To investigate whether machine learning models trained on routine clinical data from electronic health records (EHRs) can predict diagnostic progression to schizophrenia or bipolar disorder among patients undergoing treatment in psychiatric services for other mental illness. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study was based on data from EHRs from the Psychiatric Services of the Central Denmark Region. All patients aged 15 to 60 years with at least 2 contacts (at least 3 months apart) with the Psychiatric Services of the Central Denmark Region between January 1, 2013, and November 21, 2016, were included. Analysis occurred from December 2022 to November 2024. Exposures: Predictors based on EHR data, including medications, diagnoses, and clinical notes. Main Outcomes and Measures: Diagnostic transition to schizophrenia or bipolar disorder within 5 years, predicted 1 day before outpatient contacts by means of elastic net regularized logistic regression and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) models. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was used to determine the best performing model. Results: The study included 24 449 patients (median [Q1-Q3] age at time of prediction, 32.2 [24.2-42.5] years; 13 843 female [56.6%]) and 398 922 outpatient contacts. Transition to the first occurrence of either schizophrenia or bipolar disorder was predicted by the XGBoost model, with an AUROC of 0.70 (95% CI, 0.70-0.70) on the training set and 0.64 (95% CI, 0.63-0.65) on the test set, which consisted of 2 held-out hospital sites. At a predicted positive rate of 4%, the XGBoost model had a sensitivity of 9.3%, a specificity of 96.3%, and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 13.0%. Predicting schizophrenia separately yielded better performance (AUROC, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.79-0.81; sensitivity, 19.4%; specificity, 96.3%; PPV, 10.8%) than was the case for bipolar disorder (AUROC, 0.62, 95% CI, 0.61-0.63; sensitivity, 9.9%; specificity, 96.2%; PPV, 8.4%). Clinical notes proved particularly informative for prediction. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that it is possible to predict diagnostic transition to schizophrenia and bipolar disorder from routine clinical data extracted from EHRs, with schizophrenia being notably easier to predict than bipolar disorder.

Indexed as

Bipolar DisorderDisease ProgressionMachine LearningSchizophreniaAdolescentAdultCohort StudiesDenmarkElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39969874
PMCPMC12551142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.